Skip to content
Batture Park Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Batture Park Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$29kHousing & Shelter$25kCrime & Legal$12kFood & Nutrition$12kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$8kEducation$8kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$590k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
ST BERNARD COUNCIL ON AGING$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
CASA OF NEW ORLEANS$2,000
CITRUS GROVE ELEMENTARY PTA$2,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN SHREVEPORT$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY GREATER NEW ORLEANS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%MACDONELL UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1k → 16%MACDONELL UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$111k · 14 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$111k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+143%

Still filing today

64%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHuman ServicesAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +94%
  • TC
    Terrebonne Churches United Foodbank Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $12k · revenue +237%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY US DISASTER RELIEF
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • SB
    ST BERNARD SWIM CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeast Louisiana Legal Services Corp

Who we are: southeast louisiana legal services (slls) is the largest non-profit law firm in louisiana whose mission is to achieve justice through free civil legal aid to low-income people by direct case work, advocacy, and community…

Crime & Legal
2
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
3
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
4
Louisiana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Dedicated to the elimination of animal suffering by providing care and basic medical services for homeless and unwanted animals with the mission to promote, protect, and advance the well-being of louisiana's companion animals.

Animals
5
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
6
Louisiana State University School of Med in New Orleans Faculty Group Practice

The patient-centered healthcare team of the lsu healthcare network will provide the highest quality, comprehensive medical care with compassion and professionalism, while maintaining our commitment to academic excellence

Health
7
Louisiana State Medical Society

The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…

—
8
Zenobia Shriners

Shriners believe in god and that he created man to service his purpose, among which is service to others in his name. we believe that care for the less fortunate, especially children who suffer from burns and crippling disease, is our…

—
9
Heart of Louisiana Humane Society
Animals
10
St Bernards Hospital Inc

To provide christ-like healing to the community through education, treatment, and health services.

Health
11
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
12
The Samaritan Center Inc

To be a Christ centered organization which serves the spiritual needs of people of western St Tammany Parish through emergency intervention and Christian partnerships

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Louisiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pta Florida Congress-Citrus Grove Elementary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $24,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER NEW ORLEANSCASA - NEW ORLEANS: $12,000 · OtherCASA - NEW ORLEANSALS ASSOCIATION LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI CH: $11,000 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI CHST BERNARD COUNCIL ON AGING: $6,000 · OtherST BERNARD COUNCIL ON AGINGPTA Florida Congress-Citrus Grove Elementary: $4,000 · OtherPTA Florida Congress-Citrus Grove Elementary+6 more: $10,000 · Other+6 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $13,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPIT…MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $3,000 · HealthMARY BIRD PERKI…Terrebonne Churches United Foodbank Inc: $11,500 · Food & NutritionTerrebonne…THE SPIRIT OF ST BERNARD FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,000 · AnimalsSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,000 · ReligionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationMacDonell United Methodist Children's Services Inc: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$67,500Health$16,000Food & Nutrition$11,500Philanthropy$8,000Animals$6,000Religion$4,000Education$4,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCASA - NEW ORLEANS: $12,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTerrebonne Churches United Foodbank Inc: $11,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetALS ASSOCIATION LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI CH: $11,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPTA Florida Congress-Citrus Grove Elementary: $4,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMacDonell United Methodist Children's Services Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS LOUISIANA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orlea…Shell USA Company Fou…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Batture Park Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Batture Park Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Batture Park Inc?

Find your warmest path to Batture Park Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Batture Park’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home