Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bates Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$567k
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$365k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

77% of Bates Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Bates Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $567k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
3
’18
6
’19
5
’20
5
’21
3
’22
7
’23
7
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.1MReligion$977kHealth$357kEducation$353kHousing & Shelter$206kInternational$183kArts & Culture$176kEnvironment$77kOther$0
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
  • $250k+1 grant · $365k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS$365,358
INTERFAITH SANCTUARY SHELTER$50,913
Individual grant recipient$24,000
IDAHO HISTORICAL SOCIETY$20,000
ST LUKES$20,000
FACES OF HOPE$20,000
PRODIGAL SON FOUNDATION$15,000
LOWER BOISE WATERSHED COUNCIL$12,000
BOISE RIVER ENHANCEMENT NETWORK$10,000
ONE REFUGEE$10,000
MARRIOT SCHOOL NAC$7,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
BUILDING HOPE TODAY$5,000
WYAKIN FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FACES OF HOPE: $70k → 8%LOWER BOISE WATERSHED COUNCIL: $10k → 11%SCHWAB CHARITABLE: $566k → 10%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $365k → 8%MARRIOTT SCHOOL NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: $100k → 8%TIM BALLARD FOUNDATION: $60k → 13%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF: $15k → 11%BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS: $20k → 5%FACES OF HOPE: $50k → 8%SCHWAB CHARITABLE: $420k → 10%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $360k → 8%MARRIOTT SCHOOL NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: $100k → 8%BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS: $10k → 5%INTERFAITH SANCTUARY SHELTER: $30k → 8%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $61k → 8%BYU ATHLETICS: $24k → 8%FACES OF HOPE: $25k → 8%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $45k → 8%MARRIOTT SCHOOL NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: $20k → 8%FACES OF HOPE: $20k → 8%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $45k → 8%BYU ATHLETICS: $20k → 8%LOWER BOISE WATERSHED COUNCIL: $12k → 8%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $34k → 8%BYU ATHLETICS: $20k → 8%FACES: $10k → 8%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $27k → 8%BYU ATHLETICS: $15k → 8%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: $10k → 8%BYU NURSING SCHOOL: $15k → 8%BYU ATHLETICS: $15k → 8%LIFTING HANDS INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%BYU COLLEGE OF NURSING: $10k → 8%BYU COLLEGE OF NURSING: $10k → 8%BYU MARRIOT SCHOOL NAC: $10k → 8%LATTER-DAY SAINT HUMANITARIAN CENTER: $40k → 8%BYU COLLEGE OF NURSING: $10k → 8%LDS HUMANITARIAN: $10k → 8%BYU NURSING SCHOOL: $10k → 8%LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $121k → 8%LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $25k → 8%ST LUKES HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%IDAHO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $23k → 8%ST LUKES: $20k → 8%IDAHO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20k → 8%IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $18k → 8%IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $18k → 8%IDAHO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
WY
CA
UT
CO
NE
NC
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 23 repeat orgs$282k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2021, 12 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$2.4M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-19%
+76%

Still filing today

30%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthEducationInternationalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd
    2× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +197%
  • CH
    CARING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +41%
  • BH
    BUILDING HOPE TODAY INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • TB
    TIM BALLARD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • LS
    LATTER-DAY SAINT HUMANITARIAN CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
2
Idaho Foundation for Parks and Lands

To preserve and protect, for public benefit, open space lands and unique natural, scenic settings throughout the state of idaho utilizing various flexible conservation methods.

Environment
3
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
4
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
5
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
6
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
7
Independent Dairy Environmental Act League Research Foundation

Research assistance to the dairy industry.

Science & Tech
8
Sagebrush Steppe Land Trust Inc

Our mission is to protect, connect, and enhance wildlife habitat, working lands, and community spaces in southeast idaho, now and for future generations.

Environment
9
Idaho Law Foundation Inc

The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…

—
10
Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc

Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education

Crime & Legal
11
Scottish Rite Foundation of Idaho Inc
Health
12
Idaho State University Foundation Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to stimulate voluntary private support from alumni, parents, friends, corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of the University and its students.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prodigal Son Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $952,987 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSMARRIOTT SCHOOL NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: $220,000 · OtherMARRIOTT SCHOOL NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCILFACES OF HOPE: $180,000 · OtherFACES OF HOPEINTERFAITH SANCTUARY SHELTER: $176,259 · OtherINTERFAITH SANCTUARY SHELTERLDS PHILANTHROPIES: $160,000 · OtherLDS PHILANTHROPIESIndividual grant recipient: $115,000 · Other+35 more: $518,419 · Other+35 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,904,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $110,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF: $15,115 · HealthSOBRIETY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthCARING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL: $105,000 · InternationalLifting Hands International: $23,000 · InternationalBOISE RIVER ENHANCEMENT NETWORK INC: $46,000 · EnvironmentLOWER BOISE WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentIDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,068 · EnvironmentINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterBUILDING HOPE TODAY INC: $29,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,322,665Philanthropy$1,904,000Health$137,115International$128,000Environment$77,068Housing & Shelter$30,000Crime & Legal$29,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,904,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $110,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOISE RIVER ENHANCEMENT NETWORK INC: $46,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBUILDING HOPE TODAY INC: $29,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetLOWER BOISE WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetLifting Hands International: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetProdigal Son Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF: $15,115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOBRIETY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR IDAHO HISTORY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBoise Farmers Market Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSTANLEY SCHOOL PARENTS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APOLOGETIC INFORMATION AND RESEARCH: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetIdaho FFA Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAWTOOTH SOCIETY INC: $1,068 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd ↗
  • Who funds CARING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds BOISE RIVER ENHANCEMENT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING HOPE TODAY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWER BOISE WATERSHED COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Lifting Hands International ↗
  • Who funds Prodigal Son Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds SOBRIETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR IDAHO HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Boise Farmers Market Inc ↗
  • Who funds STANLEY SCHOOL PARENTS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Obsidian Foundation Inc · Harad Family Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bates Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bates Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bates Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bates Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bates Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph