Skip to content
Bash Nellie F FBO Charities Pfdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Bash Nellie F FBO Charities Pfdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$80kYouth Development$55kHuman Services$30kCommunity Improvement$20kEducation$20kReligion$15kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$659k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF TOLEDO$10,000
EMPOWERED AI INC$10,000
TOLEDO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS$5,000
SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME$5,000
LEARNING CLUB OF TOLEDO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOR HUMANITY: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 17%IMAGINATION STATION: $10k → 12%SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME: $5k → 6%ROSSFORD CONVENTION & VISITOR BUREAU: $10k → 12%RUTHERFORD B HAYES PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $10k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 15%GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN OHIO: $40k → 16%NORTHWEST OHIO SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10k → 18%BITTERSWEET FARMS: $5k → 22%ST PAUL S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 17%LEARNING CLUB OF TOLEDO: $5k → 18%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF TOLEDO: $10k → 18%HUMANE OHIO: $5k → 18%THE MAREDA CENTER: $10k → 18%EMPOWERED AI INC: $10k → 18%VALENTINE THEATRE: $30k → 18%TOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $15k → 18%TOLEDO DESIGN COLLECTIVE: $10k → 18%TOLEDO DESIGN COLLECTIVE: $10k → 18%TOLEDO TOMORROW: $10k → 18%TOLEDO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Toledo Helps Ukraine

Raise funds to support ukraine

Human Services
2
Toledo Band Aid
—
3
Hope Toledo

Supporting high quality education from cradle to career.

Education
4
Keep Toledolucas County Beautiful Inc

Education focused on litter prevention, recycling, and waste management

Environment
5
Toledo Urban Foundation Inc

A community development credit union that serves low to moderate income individuals of central toledo.

Public Benefit
6
Assets Toledo

To assist self-motivated individuals in northwest ohio who have a personal vision for self-employment and small business initiatives, but limited resources, by providing hands-on training, peer networking, and support network and capital.

Employment
7
Toledo Independent Childcare Center

Providing daycare

Human Services
8
Toledo Artist Club

Education in the arts and crafts

—
9
Toledo Repertoire Company

To entertain, educate and serve toledo, ohio and the surrounding region through live theatre.

Arts & Culture
10
Toledo Science Center

Empower everyone to explore the sciences through interactive exhibits and educational programming.

Arts & Culture
11
The Arts Commission of Greater Toledo I

To develop and promote arts in the greater toledo community

Arts & Culture
12
Toledo Community Theatre Guild D/B/a Wieting Theatre

To operate and run a community theatre.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Ohio Scholarship Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rutherford B Hayes Presidential Library and Museums. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALENTINE THEATRE: $30,000 · OtherVALENTINE THEATRECATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESMAREDA CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherMAREDA CENTER INCROSSFORD CONVENTION AND VISITORS BU: $10,000 · OtherROSSFORD CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUNORTHWEST OHIO SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $10,000 · OtherNORTHWEST OHIO SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCST PAUL S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherST PAUL S LUTHERAN CHURCHTOLEDO SYMPHONY: $10,000 · OtherTOLEDO SYMPHONYEMPOWERED AI INC: $10,000 · OtherEMPOWERED AI INCBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF TOLEDO: $10,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF TOLEDOBITTERSWEET INC: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $5,000 · OtherSISTERS OF NOTRE DAME: $5,000 · OtherTOLEDO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 · OtherGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts of We…TOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTOLEDO OPERA A…RUTHERFORD B HAYES PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUMS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRUTHERFORD B H…THE IMAGINATION STATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE IMAGINATIO…TOLEDO TOMORROW: $10,000 · EducationTOLEDO TOM…FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · EducationFOR HUMANI…Learning Club of Toledo: $5,000 · EducationLearning C…TOLEDO DESIGN COLLECTIVE 1 SEAGATE: $20,000 · Community ImprovementHUMANE OHIO: $5,000 · Animals
Other$140,000Youth Development$40,000Arts & Culture$35,000Education$25,000Community Improvement$20,000Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTOLEDO DESIGN COLLECTIVE 1 SEAGATE: $20,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTOLEDO TOMORROW: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetROSSFORD CONVENTION AND VISITORS BU: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNORTHWEST OHIO SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetRUTHERFORD B HAYES PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUMS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLearning Club of Toledo: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBITTERSWEET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE OHIO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Walter E Terhune Memo…Toledo Community Foun…Elsie and Harry Baumk…The LaValley Foundati…Robert C and Susan M …John Henry Eldred Jr …Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Walter E Terhune Memorial FundOH26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walter E Terhune Memorial Fund · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Elsie and Harry Baumker Charitable Foundation Inc · The LaValley Foundation · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bash Nellie F FBO Charities Pfdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bash Nellie F FBO Charities Pfdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bash Nellie F FBO Charities Pfdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home