Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$382k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.1MRecreation & Sports$180kHealth$112kAnimals$108kEducation$89kHuman Services$65kPublic Benefit$27kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $294k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$200,000
BPS FOUNDATION$94,000
TELLURIDE FILM ASSOCIATION$17,450
WICHITA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$15,000
ORPHEUM THEATRE$10,000
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER WICHITA$10,000
CEREBRAL PALSY RESERACH FOUNDATION$7,500
THE LORDS DINER$5,000
WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER$5,000
HEROES ACADEMY$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCATION$5,000
THE GRUMPY OLD MEN$3,000
HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $11k → 17%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $28k → 14%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%CHILD START: $3k → 16%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%CHILD START INC: $2k → 16%GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%THE GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%THE GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $500 → 16%STARKEY INC: $75k → 16%STARKEY INC: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
NV
CA
MD
KS
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 20 repeat orgs$294k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
19

Total granted

$1.5M
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+23%

Still filing today

45%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    Wichita Art Museum Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $977k · revenue +69%
  • SI
    STARKEY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +30%
  • KA
    KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $34k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLAYERS PHILANTHROPHIC FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $74k
  • SS
    STUDENT STARTUP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +11%
  • CP
    CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KS
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
2
Wichita Swim Club

The wichita swim club is dedicated to competitive swimming, serving swimmers from all over the wichita and south central kansas area

Recreation & Sports
3
Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc

Wplf seeks private charitable support to create young readers, ensure digital inclusion, and provide equitable access to information. wplf's sole purpose is to create a margin of excellence at wichita public library.

Education
4
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
5
Wichita Eye Foundation

To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.

Health
6
Wichita Kids Golf Initiative Inc

First tee is a youth development organization that enables kids to build strength of character that empowers them through a lifetime of new challenges. we create active learning experiences that build inner strength, self-confidence, and…

Youth Development
7
Wichita Montessori School Inc

We seek to provide a superior educational experience for children ages 3 to 11, utilizing the montessori methods of teaching and learning. we address the intellectual, emotional, physical and social growth of each child.

—
8
Greater Kansas City Sports Foundation

Foster and support amateur sports competition

Recreation & Sports
9
Opportunity Wichita Inc

Engage community partners (including local governments, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions) to develop a community vision to address education, quality of life, infrastructure, workforce, and economic development and…

Community Improvement
10
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
11
Boys Club of Greater Kansas City

The organization promotes the personal development of boys and girls ages 5-18, with special concern for the disadvantaged by providing services that build self-esteem, values and skills during critical periods of growth.

Youth Development
12
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Action for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Timothy P O'shaughnessy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wichita Art Museum Inc: $976,500 · Arts & CultureWichita Art Museum Inc+2 more: $11,500 · Arts & CultureSEDGWICK COUNTY ZOO: $108,000 · OtherSEDGWICK COUNTY ZOOBPS FOUNDATION: $94,000 · OtherBPS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $74,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLAYERS PHILANTHROPHIC FUND: $74,000 · OtherPLAYERS PHILANTHROPHIC FUNDTELLURIDE FILM ASSOCIATION: $62,350 · OtherTELLURIDE FILM ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL FILM PRESERVE TELLURIDE: $34,900 · OtherNATIONAL FILM PRESERVE TELLURIDEWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $26,899 · Other+24 more: $164,750 · Other+24 moreSTARKEY INC: $75,250 · Human ServicesKANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesGrumpy Old Men Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $11,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,500 · Human ServicesPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $20,500 · EducationWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationTIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationSTORYTIME VILLAGE INC: $1,000 · EducationSTUDENT STARTUP INC: $20,000 · EmploymentWICHITA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyWICHITA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyHEROES ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$988,000Other$638,899Human Services$139,750Education$27,500Employment$20,000Philanthropy$18,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWichita Art Museum Inc: $976,500 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetBPS FOUNDATION: $94,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTARKEY INC: $75,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC: $34,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $20,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENT STARTUP INC: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetGrumpy Old Men Inc: $15,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION: $11,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCouncil for a Strong America: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD START INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORYTIME VILLAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SEDGWICK COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA PARKS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds BPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STARKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDENT STARTUP INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Grumpy Old Men Inc ↗
  • Who funds TALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds Council for a Strong America ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEROES ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD START INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Foundation IncKS26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Foundation Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Ima Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Annie Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Servant Foundation · DeVore Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barry L and Paula M Downing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph