Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$382k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$988kHuman Services$140kEducation$28kEmployment$20kPhilanthropy$18kCrime & Legal$5kYouth Development$1kHealth$1kEnvironment$500Other$636k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $294k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$200,000
BPS FOUNDATION$94,000
TELLURIDE FILM ASSOCIATION$17,450
WICHITA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$15,000
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER WICHITA$10,000
ORPHEUM THEATRE$10,000
CEREBRAL PALSY RESERACH FOUNDATION$7,500
HEROES ACADEMY$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCATION$5,000
WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
THE LORDS DINER$5,000
FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER$5,000
THE GRUMPY OLD MEN$3,000
HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $11k → 17%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $28k → 14%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%CHILD START: $3k → 16%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%CHILD START INC: $2k → 16%GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%THE GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%THE GRUMPY OLD MEN: $3k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $500 → 16%STARKEY INC: $75k → 16%STARKEY INC: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
NV
CA
MD
KS
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 20 repeat orgs$294k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
19

Total granted

$1.5M
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+23%

Still filing today

45%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    Wichita Art Museum Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $977k · revenue +69%
  • SI
    STARKEY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +30%
  • KA
    KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $34k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLAYERS PHILANTHROPHIC FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $74k
  • SS
    STUDENT STARTUP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +11%
  • CP
    CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KS
    one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
2
Wichita Swim Club

The wichita swim club is dedicated to competitive swimming, serving swimmers from all over the wichita and south central kansas area

Recreation & Sports
3
Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc

Wplf seeks private charitable support to create young readers, ensure digital inclusion, and provide equitable access to information. wplf's sole purpose is to create a margin of excellence at wichita public library.

Education
4
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

5
Wichita Eye Foundation

To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.

Health
6
Wichita Kids Golf Initiative Inc

First tee is a youth development organization that enables kids to build strength of character that empowers them through a lifetime of new challenges. we create active learning experiences that build inner strength, self-confidence, and…

Youth Development
7
Wichita Montessori School Inc

We seek to provide a superior educational experience for children ages 3 to 11, utilizing the montessori methods of teaching and learning. we address the intellectual, emotional, physical and social growth of each child.

8
Greater Kansas City Sports Foundation

Foster and support amateur sports competition

Recreation & Sports
9
Opportunity Wichita Inc

Engage community partners (including local governments, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions) to develop a community vision to address education, quality of life, infrastructure, workforce, and economic development and…

Community Improvement
10
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
11
Boys Club of Greater Kansas City

The organization promotes the personal development of boys and girls ages 5-18, with special concern for the disadvantaged by providing services that build self-esteem, values and skills during critical periods of growth.

Youth Development
12
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Action for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Timothy P O'shaughnessy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%10%<5yr11%10%5–10yr16%19%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr25%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%1%<5yr11%2%5–10yr16%83%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr15%4%35–55yr25%7%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
9%
1,530/17,497

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Wichita Art Museum Inc — $976,500 · Arts & CultureWichita Art Museum Inc+2 more — $11,500 · Arts & CultureSEDGWICK COUNTY ZOO — $108,000 · OtherSEDGWICK COUNTY ZOOBPS FOUNDATION — $94,000 · OtherBPS FOUNDATIONPLAYERS PHILANTHROPHIC FUND — $74,000 · OtherPLAYERS PHILANTHROPHIC FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $74,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTELLURIDE FILM ASSOCIATION — $62,350 · OtherTELLURIDE FILM ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL FILM PRESERVE TELLURIDE — $34,900 · OtherNATIONAL FILM PRESERVE TELLURIDEWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY — $26,899 · Other+24 more — $164,750 · Other+24 moreSTARKEY INC — $75,250 · Human ServicesKANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC — $34,000 · Human ServicesGrumpy Old Men Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC — $11,000 · Human Services+2 more — $4,500 · Human ServicesPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $20,500 · EducationWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationSTORYTIME VILLAGE INC — $1,000 · EducationTIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationSTUDENT STARTUP INC — $20,000 · EmploymentWICHITA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · PhilanthropyWICHITA FOUNDATION — $3,000 · PhilanthropyHEROES ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$988,000Other$638,899Human Services$139,750Education$27,500Employment$20,000Philanthropy$18,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWichita Art Museum Inc — $976,500 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetBPS FOUNDATION — $94,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTARKEY INC — $75,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC — $34,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $20,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENT STARTUP INC — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetGrumpy Old Men Inc — $15,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION — $11,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCouncil for a Strong America — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD START INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORYTIME VILLAGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SEDGWICK COUNTY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA PARKS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc
  • Who funds BPS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STARKEY INC
  • Who funds KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds STUDENT STARTUP INC
  • Who funds Grumpy Old Men Inc
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC
  • Who funds Council for a Strong America
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC
  • Who funds KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEROES ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds CHILD START INC
  • Who funds WICHITA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STORYTIME VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SEDGWICK COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Foundation IncKS26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Foundation Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Ima Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Annie Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Servant Foundation · DeVore Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barry L and Paula M Downing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph