Skip to content
Barelli Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Barelli Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$925kHealth$460kFood & Nutrition$300kInternational$190kEducation$30kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$762k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PAN AMERICAN HEALTH SERVICES INC$10,000
MISSIONARY PARTNERS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAYMEN MINISTRIES: $60k → 14%WEIMAR INSTITUTE: $300k → 6%SECRETS UNSEALED: $20k → 19%PAN AMERICAN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $10k → 10%ASAP MINISTRIES: $200k → 15%REMNANT PUBLICATIONS: $300k → 16%VOLLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 5%BCSS BANGLA HOPE: $10k → 12%PILGRIMS REST: $100k → 21%MISSIONARY PARTNERS: $10k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE: $50k → 9%BCSS BANGLA HOPE: $10k → 11%FARM STEW INTERNATIONAL: $100k → 13%ADVENTIST WORLD RADIO: $10k → 8%LAYMEN MINISTRIES: $30k → 14%WEIMAR UNIVERSITY: $200k → 6%PAN AMERICAN HEALTH SERVICE INC: $100k → 10%ASAP MINISTRIES: $100k → 15%REMNANT PUBLICATIONS: $100k → 16%PILGRAMS REST: $10k → 21%MISSIONARY PARTNERS: $5k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE: $10k → 9%PAN AMERICAN HEALTH SERVICE INC: $40k → 10%ASAP MINISTRIES: $100k → 15%PAN AMERICAN HEALTH SERVICE INC: $10k → 10%ADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS: $100k → 15%ADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS: $20k → 15%ADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
MI
OR
CA
MD
KS
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$916k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$896k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
-10%

Still filing today

57%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureEducationReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    ASAP MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue -20%
  • RP
    Remnant Publications Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $400k · revenue -11%
  • PA
    Pan American Health Service Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $150k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • WI
    Weimar Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue -10%
  • WU
    WEIMAR UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • AF
    ADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $130k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
2
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
3
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
4
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
5
Adventist Mountain Missions
Religion
6
Euromedia Missions
—
7
Follow Him Media Inc
Religion
8
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
9
Inter-America Mission
—
10
Pacific Island Ministries

To help fulfill the great commission as found in Matthew 28:19-20, the equipping of God's people for works of service, particularly in Papua New Guinea.

International
11
Christian Ministries International
—
12
Divine Revelation Ministry
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Secrets Unsealed Inc; the most unlike its peers is Volland Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Weimar Institute: $300,000 · OtherWeimar InstituteWEIMAR UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherWEIMAR UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAYMEN MINISTRIES: $90,000 · OtherLAYMEN MINISTRIES+6 more: $70,000 · Other+6 moreASAP MINISTRIES INC: $400,000 · InternationalASAP MINISTRIES INCPan American Health Service Inc: $150,000 · InternationalPan American Health Service IncADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS INC: $130,000 · InternationalADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS INCINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INC: $60,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INCRemnant Publications Inc: $400,000 · Arts & CultureRemnant Publications I…FARM STEW INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 · Food & NutritionAmazing Discoveries: $30,000 · EducationSECRETS UNSEALED INC: $20,000 · ReligionVOLLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$760,000International$740,000Arts & Culture$400,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Education$30,000Religion$20,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASAP MINISTRIES INC: $400,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetRemnant Publications Inc: $400,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetWeimar Institute: $300,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPan American Health Service Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS INC: $130,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFARM STEW INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAmazing Discoveries: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSECRETS UNSEALED INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVOLLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASAP MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Remnant Publications Inc ↗
  • Who funds Weimar Institute ↗
  • Who funds Pan American Health Service Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTIST FRONTIER MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM STEW INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Amazing Discoveries ↗
  • Who funds SECRETS UNSEALED INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asi Missions IncYou Are My Neighbor F…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Asi Missions IncMD15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asi Missions Inc · You Are My Neighbor Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barelli Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barelli Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barelli’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home