Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barbara Judy Thomas Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$45kHousing & Shelter$27kInternational$14kReligion$7kHealth$2kEducation$1k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,515
Median grant
3
States reached
$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$5,515
STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES$5,515
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,515
WORLD VISION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $6k → 16%STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 23%THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 7%HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $6k → 16%STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 23%OLIVER GOSPEL MISSION: $4k → 16%STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 23%OLIVER GOSPEL MISSION: $1k → 16%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6k → 23%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6k → 23%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 23%HABITIAT FOR HUMANITY MCA: $2k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$78k · 6 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$78k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+85%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $17k
  • FP
    FRIENDSHIP PLACE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $16k · revenue -15%
  • HH
    HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK
    4× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue -15%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +85%
  • HF
    HABITIAT FOR HUMANITY MCA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • THE CITADEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
2
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
3
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
The Giving Plate

Feeding the hungry today with compassion and hospitality

Food & Nutrition
6
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Cathedral Soup Kitchen Inc

The Cathedral Soup Kitchen, Inc.'s mission is to help people out of food insecurity and champion their pursuit of stability and prosperity. Our vision is hope, success, and abundance for people in need in Camden. The organization serves a…

Human Services
8
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Every Meal

Every meal's mission is to fight child hunger through community and school partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
10
Christians Reaching Out to Society Inc

CROS serves the hungry by distributing food at local pantries, recovering and distributing fresh produce that would otherwise go to waste, serving lunch at local meal sites, delivering prepared meals to the homebound.

Religion
11
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Food Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Oliver Gospel Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $15,562 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANKMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $13,685 · Food & NutritionMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17,082 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10,215 · OtherSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INCHABITIAT FOR HUMANITY MCA: $1,500 · OtherFRIENDSHIP PLACE INC: $16,240 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDSHIP PLACE IN…WORLD VISION INC: $14,165 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCOliver Gospel Mission: $5,490 · ReligionAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,769 · HealthTHE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education
Food & Nutrition$29,247Other$28,797Housing & Shelter$16,240International$14,165Religion$5,490Health$1,769Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDSHIP PLACE INC: $16,240 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $15,562 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $14,165 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $13,685 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10,215 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOliver Gospel Mission: $5,490 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,769 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC10.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barbara Judy Thomas Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barbara Judy Thomas Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barbara Judy Thomas Memorial Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barbara Judy Thomas Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barbara Judy Thomas Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph