Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Barbara Ingalls Shook Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$636kHealth$316kArts & Culture$252kScience & Tech$188kCommunity Improvement$155kRecreation & Sports$100kYouth Development$85kCrime & Legal$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100,000
ST CLAIR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC$35,000
ST CLAIR COUNTY DAY PROGRAM INC$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PASSTHROUGHS$6
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VINEYARD FAMILY SERVICES OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $5k → 7%ST CLAIR COUNTY DAY PROGRAM INC: $35k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 12 repeat orgs$462k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$1.4M
$392k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+25%

Still filing today

67%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    VULCAN PARK FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $195k · revenue +14%
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $188k · revenue +182%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2018–2025 · $111k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • RM
    RED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -66%
  • U
    UAB
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • MM
    MEGAN MONTGOMERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $55k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
2
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
3
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
Arkansas Children's Foundation

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
6
The American Society for Clinical Investigation Inc

The american society for clinical investigation seeks to support the scientific efforts, educational needs, and clinical aspirations of physician-scientists to improve the health of all people.

Unclassified
7
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

8
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
9
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
10
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
11
Arkansas Children's Research Institute

The vision of arkansas children's research institute is to be a leader in cutting-edge research that improves the health and well-being of children and their families. in support of this vision, arkansas children's research institute aims…

12
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspen Valley Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY INC — $188,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE LAW AND PUBL…Individual grant recipient — $155,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherRED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATIONUAB — $100,000 · OtherUABMEGAN MONTGOMERY FOUNDATION — $55,000 · OtherMEGAN MONTGOMERY FOUNDATIONGIRLS INC — $50,000 · OtherGIRLS INCALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION — $49,100 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONRED MOUNTAIN THEATER — $26,500 · OtherARGO COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $26,500 · Other+9 more — $25,510 · OtherBirmingham Zoo Inc — $621,000 · AnimalsBirmingham Zoo Inc+2 more — $15,000 · AnimalsVULCAN PARK FOUNDATION — $194,500 · Recreation & SportsVULCAN PARK…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $111,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthASPEN VALL…+3 more — $5,000 · HealthST CLAIR COUNTY DAY PROGRAM INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesVineyard Family Services of Central Alabama Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesST CLAIR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE STATE OF ALABAMA BALLET INC — $11,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$775,610Animals$636,000Recreation & Sports$194,500Health$166,000Human Services$40,000Philanthropy$35,000Arts & Culture$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBirmingham Zoo Inc — $621,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetVULCAN PARK FOUNDATION — $194,500 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $111,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetST CLAIR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $35,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetST CLAIR COUNTY DAY PROGRAM INC — $35,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STATE OF ALABAMA BALLET INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER — $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetATEAM MINISTRIES — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTUM TUM TREE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joseph S Bruno Charitable FoundationAL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundation · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · The James Milton and Sallie R Johnson Foundation · The Welch Group Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Barbara Ingalls Shook Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barbara Ingalls Shook Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barbara Ingalls Shook Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph