Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barbara F Wheeler Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$420k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.2MReligion$690kFood & Nutrition$448kHealth$443kCrime & Legal$300kEducation$80kYouth Development$50k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $360k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY ARC$60,000
MANNA STOREHOUSE$40,000
SISTERS OF ST MARY OF NAMUR$40,000
HOLY REDEEMER CATHOLIC PARISH$30,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINECENT DE PAUL$30,000
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES$30,000
PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE$25,000
WHOLE LIFE AUTHENTIC CARE$25,000
HOLY FAMILY PARISH$25,000
ALEDO UNITED METHODIT CHURCH$20,000
BEAUTIFUL FEET MINISTRIES$20,000
THREE MOUNTAINS MINISTRIES$15,000
COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$15,000
CATHOLIC WORLDVIEW FELLOWSHIP$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $838k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER OF HOPE: $60k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $50k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $40k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $40k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $40k → 8%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $40k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 11%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $40k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 11%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $40k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 11%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $40k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 11%MANNA STOREHOUSE: $40k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 11%CENTER OF HOPE: $30k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 11%CENTER OF HOPE: $30k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $15k → 11%CENTER OF HOPE: $30k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $30k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $30k → 8%PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS: $18k → 11%COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
PA
NE
AZ
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 23 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
6

Total granted

$3.0M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+20%

Still filing today

39%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MANNA STOREHOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $320k · revenue +153%
  • CO
    CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +42%
  • PC
    PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $285k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH-FOOD
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • AE
    ALEDO EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Non-Profit Hospice Alliance

The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.

Human Services
2
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
3
Feeding the Lone Star Llc

Uniting volunteers to prepare meals that get delivered to the food insecure

Food & Nutrition
4
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
5
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
6
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
7
Meals On Wheels Montgomery County

To foster the independence and dignity of homebound seniors in montgomery county by providing them with nutritious meals, transportation, and caring connections.

—
8
Covenant Behavioral Health

Counseling

Health
9
Meals On Wheels and More Inc

To nourish and enrich the lives of the homebound and other people in need through programs that promote dignity and independent living.

Food & Nutrition
10
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
11
Life Choices Medical Center

Christian organization offering a hopeful future by empowering women and men to make life-affirming decisions

Human Services
12
Dallas-High Shoals Christian Social Ministry Inc

Assisting the poor and needy with food, clothing, medical , rent, and utilites.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Healthcare of Texas; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Worldview Fellowship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY ARC: $480,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY ARCST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH- SOCIAL: $233,000 · OtherST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH- SOCIALHOLY REDEEMER CATHOLIC PARISH: $224,000 · OtherHOLY REDEEMER CATHOLIC PARISHMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $130,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONBEAUTIFUL FEET CHURCH S B C INC: $110,000 · OtherBEAUTIFUL FEET CHURCH S B C INCSISTERS OF ST MARY OF NAMUR: $88,000 · OtherThe American Legion: $70,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · Other+18 more: $447,500 · Other+18 moreMANNA STOREHOUSE INC: $320,000 · Human ServicesMANNA STOREHOUSE INCPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $285,000 · Human ServicesPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE …MEALS ON WHEELS: $155,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELSCommunity Healthcare of Texas: $77,500 · Human ServicesCommunity Healthcare of TexasCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $300,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF GR…WHOLELIFE AUTHENTIC CARE: $155,000 · HealthFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education
Other$1,852,500Human Services$837,500Civil Rights$300,000Health$155,000Education$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANNA STOREHOUSE INC: $320,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $300,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $285,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $155,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetWHOLELIFE AUTHENTIC CARE: $155,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetCommunity Healthcare of Texas: $77,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Legion: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC WORLDVIEW FELLOWSHIP: $20,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANNA STOREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds WHOLELIFE AUTHENTIC CARE ↗
  • Who funds Community Healthcare of Texas ↗
  • Who funds The American Legion ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC WORLDVIEW FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barbara F Wheeler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barbara F Wheeler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barbara F Wheeler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph