Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bar-Yadin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$804k
Granted FY2021
26
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$105k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of Bar-Yadin Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of San Antonio, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Bar-Yadin Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $804k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
8
’18
8
’19
12
’20
9
’21
9
’22
10
’23
10
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.1MInternational$1.9MPhilanthropy$1.7MRecreation & Sports$411kHuman Services$284kYouth Development$200kEducation$172kCivil Rights$124kOther$0
02FY2021 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k10 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $590k
$18,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP YOUNG JUDEA INC$105,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO$90,000
TEXAS HILLEL$85,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$75,000
AIEF$75,000
AMERICAN SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL$60,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$50,000
HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
CONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM$37,420
CHABAD OF SAN MARCOS$24,000
ISRAEL GUIDE DOGE CENTER FOR THE BLIND$18,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$18,000
MIKVAH RIO GRANDE VALLEY$18,000
CHABAD ISRAELI CENTER$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 6%Sulam: $2k → 8%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOGE CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 6%Jewish Family Service: $18k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
NV
OH
PA
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of Bar-Yadin Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bar-Yadin Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 44 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2021, 24 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
14

Total granted

$4.6M
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+15%

Still filing today

20%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    Camp Young Judaea Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $665k · revenue +79%
  • AG
    AMERICA GIVES INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $216k · revenue +226%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $175k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TU
    Technion University
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • IL
    ISRAEL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
4
The Jerusalem Connection
—
5
Texas Jewish Security Initiative
Crime & Legal
6
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
7
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
8
Jewish Life Foundation
—
9
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
10
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
11
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
12
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Hillel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Vaad Hakashruth of San Antonio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AIEF: $350,000 · OtherAIEFCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE & LEARNING: $262,300 · OtherCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE & LEARNINGCHABAD OF SAN MARCOS: $229,000 · OtherCHABAD OF SAN MARCOSCONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM BNAI ISRAEL: $226,814 · OtherCONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM BNAI ISRAELCAMP YOUNG JUDEA NORTH CAROLINA: $200,000 · OtherCAMP YOUNG JUDEA NORTH CAROLINAAmerican Support for Israel: $195,000 · OtherAmerican Support for IsraelTEXAS HILLEL THE TOPFER CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $166,600 · OtherHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $158,000 · OtherTEXAS HILLEL: $144,000 · OtherJERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC: $130,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE IDF TEXAS REGION: $123,600 · Other+43 more: $1,152,998 · Other+43 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $1,710,552 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIOPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $658,450 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCAMERICA GIVES INC: $216,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INCJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $365,000 · InternationalJEWISH NAT…AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $275,000 · InternationalAMERICAN I…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $61,200 · InternationalFRIENDS OF…+2 more: $25,000 · InternationalCamp Young Judaea Inc: $665,000 · Recreation & SportsCamp Youn…HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $175,000 · ReligionEvelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston: $18,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $90,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $18,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,800 · Human ServicesHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $36,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $1,800 · Arts & CultureSEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC: $18,000 · Health
Other$3,338,312Philanthropy$2,585,002International$726,200Recreation & Sports$665,000Religion$194,000Human Services$109,800Arts & Culture$37,800Health$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $1,710,552 over 8y, 11% of budgetCamp Young Judaea Inc: $665,000 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $658,450 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $365,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $275,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $216,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $175,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $90,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTEXAS HILLEL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $61,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $36,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetISRAEL AIRFORCE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEvelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRobert M Beren Academy: $11,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSulam Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVAAD HAKASHRUTH OF SAN ANTONIO: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds Camp Young Judaea Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds HONESTREPORTINGCOM INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL AIRFORCE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater HoustonTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Houston · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Jewish Federation of San Antonio · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Houston Jewish Community Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bar-Yadin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bar-Yadin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bar-Yadin Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bar-Yadin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bar-Yadin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph