Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bajaj Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$288kHealth$58kEducation$27kFood & Nutrition$10kCrime & Legal$10kInternational$7kHuman Services$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GURU NANAK FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$40,351
THE GURU GOBIND SINGH FOUNDATION$7,350
MONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT$5,000
WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION$2,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,500
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$2,000
THE KENNEDY CENTER$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$1,000
NEHA K RAJPAL FOUNDATION$1,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS$1,000
DC FOOD BANK$1,000
COVENANT HOUSE$1,000
SMILE TRAIN$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KARUNA CHARITIES: $300 → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIORS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 17 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$378k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-2%

Still filing today

76%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GURU GOBIND SINGH FOUNDATION TRUST
    4× · 2021–2024 · $118k · revenue +30% · 30% of their budget
  • SH
    SUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $35k · revenue +37%
  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OF INDIAN ORIGIN GWAPI
    2× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • BP
    BOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -6%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns

Founded in 1986, mtppi is a research organization specializing in health service research, education and health policy analysis of new and emerging technologies.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

Employment
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
11
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Karuna Charities New York Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GURU NANAK FOUNDATION OF AMERICAN: $169,851 · OtherGURU NANAK FOUNDATION OF AMERICANBOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $20,000 · OtherBOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INCMONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $30,600 · Other+11 moreGURU GOBIND SINGH FOUNDATION TRUST: $117,951 · ReligionGURU GOBIND SINGH FOUNDATION TR…SUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 · HealthSUBURBAN HOSP…GREATER WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OF INDIAN ORIGIN GWAPI: $5,500 · HealthGREATER WASHI…American Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Hear…American Diabetes Association: $4,000 · HealthAmerican Diab…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,000 · InternationalSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationClassroom 2 Community Inc: $2,000 · EducationCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesKARUNA CHARITIES NEW YORK INC: $300 · Human ServicesWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$230,451Religion$117,951Health$50,500International$6,500Education$6,000Human Services$4,300Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGURU GOBIND SINGH FOUNDATION TRUST: $117,951 over 4y, 30% of budgetSUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OF INDIAN ORIGIN GWAPI: $5,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KENNEDY COLLECTIVE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClassroom 2 Community Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKARUNA CHARITIES NEW YORK INC: $300 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bajaj Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bajaj Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Kennedy Collective Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Suburban Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bajaj Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph