Skip to content
Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs

Educational-operation of private girls' high school

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$50kEducation$44kFood & Nutrition$23kHealth$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $22,960, the rows itemized in this filing. The $35,150 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,190 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,680
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV$10,000
LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL$7,680
MESIVTA KEREN ORAH$5,280
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%KEREN HASHVIIS: $8k → 7%BAIS YAAKOV HS: $11k → 11%BNOS YAAKOV: $10k → 11%VEROMAMTANU: $10k → 11%TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV: $10k → 11%TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV: $10k → 11%BAIS YAAKOV HS: $9k → 11%BNOS MELECH OF A LAKEWOOD: $9k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL: $8k → 11%OHR HATORAH: $8k → 11%MOADIM L'SIMCHA: $6k → 11%MOADIM L'SIMCHA: $6k → 11%MESIVTA NACHLAS YISROEL: $6k → 11%MOADIM L'SIMCHA: $5k → 11%MESIVTA KEREN ORAH: $5k → 11%TOMCHEI SHABBOS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 3 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$63k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+115%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $23k · revenue +134%
  • BY
    Bais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc
    2× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +57%
  • TB
    TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +98%
  • CG
    CONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BM
    BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +132%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
2
Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc

Operation of a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
3
Bais Reuven Kamenetz of Lakewood

Educational. operation of a parochial elementary school, which provides religious and secular education to school-age children.

Education
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
5
Masores Bnos Yisroel Inc

Masores bnos yisroel is a religious elementary school providing quality education for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
6
Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs

Educational-operation of private girls' high school

—
7
Bais Shaindel

Bais shaindel is a religious girls high school in lakewood, nj, providing quality education for grades 9-12.

Education
8
Mesivta Ohr Yisroel Inc

Parochial secondary school.

Education
9
Beis Hachinuch Inc

To provide hebrew religious and secular education for elementary children in a warm and nurturing environment

Education
10
Bais Yaakov Girls High School of Minneapolis

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education
11
Bnos Bais Yaakov of Far Rockaway

To maintain a school for hebrew religious and secular education.

Education
12
Bais Yaakov of Jackson Inc

Parochial high school

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregation Bnos Yaakov Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lakewood Cheder School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $20,000 · EducationBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood IncTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $20,000 · EducationTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INCCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $10,400 · EducationCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INCBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $8,750 · EducationBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INCLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $7,680 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INCYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $7,500 · EducationYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INCMESIVTA KEREN ORAH: $5,280 · EducationMESIVTA KEREN ORAHTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $23,211 · Food & NutritionTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LA…CONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY: $10,385 · OtherCONGREGATION G…CONGREGATION NACHLAS YISROEL INC: $6,000 · OtherCONGREGATION N…KEREN HASHVIIS INC: $8,255 · Religion
Education$79,610Food & Nutrition$23,211Other$16,385Religion$8,255

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $23,211 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $10,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $8,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $8,255 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $7,680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMESIVTA KEREN ORAH: $5,280 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Fund IncThe Ojc FundJewish Communal FundTifferet Moshe IncYeshiva Shagas Aryeh …Jewish Community Foun…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donors Fund IncNJ17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Fund Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Tifferet Moshe Inc · Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Mesivta Keren Orah: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $15k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home