Skip to content

· Private foundation

B Thomas Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$136kHealth$75kFood & Nutrition$42kHuman Services$33kHousing & Shelter$32kRecreation & Sports$26kEducation$24kCrime & Legal$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$793k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DONTE'S DEN FOUNDATION$10,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$10,000
IRON PHI FOUNDATION$10,000
DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION$10,000
CENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTH$8,000
ROUND UP RIVER RANCH$8,000
SPCA OF TEXAS$8,000
STRAYDOG INC$8,000
OPERATION KINDNESS$8,000
THE FAMILY PLACE$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER$5,000
CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH$5,000
doodle rock rescue$5,000
CASA OF COLLIN COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE FAMILY PLACE: $6k → 5%VOGEL ALCOVE: $5k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $5k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $3k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $3k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $3k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$380k · 18 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$380k
$3k

Still filing today

72%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationReligionRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +105%
  • SI
    STRAYDOG INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +37%
  • OK
    OPERATION KINDNESS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +240%

Funded once

  • M
    MAINGAIT
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Street Dog Advocates

Dallas street dog advocates is committed to rescuing the stray and forgotten dogs off the streets of dallas, providing them with necessary medical care and training, and finding them permanent homes where they will be cared for the rest of…

Animals
2
Divine Canines

Divine canines therapy encourages smiles and brightens lives. to accomplish this, we recruit and train teams of dogs and their owners and organize and facilitate regular, frequent visits to residents of special care facilities.

Animals
3
Dogs Playing for Life Inc

Dogs playing for life is redefining the meaning and importance of quality of life for all sheltered dogs by improving their experience through playgroups and individualized training, resulting in urgent and responsible livesaving.

Animals
4
Silicon Valley Pet Project

Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.

Animals
5
Defenders of Animal Rights Inc

Animal rescues. pet adoption center. shelter cruelty victims. farm animals. wildlife refuge. spay/neuter. humane education. youth work. grief counseling. human health via pets.

Animals
6
Raskels Rescue
Animals
7
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
8
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
9
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
10
Pasado's Safe Haven

Fighting to end animal cruelty and create a more compassionate world.(continued in schedule o)fiscal year 2024-2025 highlights include:investigated/resourced 71 animal cruelty cases, provided care andrehabilitations for 398 animals at our…

Animals
11
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
12
Texas Round Up Animal Alliance Inc

Adoption and shelter facility for unwanted, abandoned and neglected animals. provide aid to the community who need help with vetting or care of their animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca of Texas; the most unlike its peers is Donte's Den Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $41,800 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKCENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTH: $32,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTHIRON PHI FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherIRON PHI FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $19,000 · OtherGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTERDALLAS LIFE HOMELESS SHELTER: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $3,000 · OtherSPCA of Texas: $34,000 · AnimalsSPCA of TexasSTRAYDOG INC: $30,000 · AnimalsSTRAYDOG INCOPERATION KINDNESS: $28,900 · AnimalsOPERATION KINDNESSDOODLE ROCK RESCUE: $28,100 · AnimalsDOODLE ROCK RESCUEDONTE'S DEN FOUNDATION: $15,000 · AnimalsDONTE'S DEN FOUNDATIONVOGEL ALCOVE: $27,000 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOV…CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $8,000 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'…The Family Place: $5,500 · Human ServicesThe Family …ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $26,000 · Recreation & SportsDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationBright Futures Foundation: $4,000 · EducationCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsSpark Ministry: $6,500 · Religion
Other$145,800Animals$136,000Human Services$40,500Recreation & Sports$26,000Education$24,000Civil Rights$15,000Religion$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $41,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $34,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAYDOG INC: $30,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $28,900 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDOODLE ROCK RESCUE: $28,100 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE: $27,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $26,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetIRON PHI FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDONTE'S DEN FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpark Ministry: $6,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBright Futures Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
  • Who funds STRAYDOG INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds DOODLE ROCK RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds IRON PHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONTE'S DEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COLLIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds Spark Ministry ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds Bright Futures Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B Thomas Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B Thomas Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Donte's Den Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to B Thomas Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to B Thomas Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on B Thomas Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph