Skip to content
B Girls Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

B Girls Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$75kFood & Nutrition$41kHuman Services$26kCivil Rights$25kAnimals$18kPublic Benefit$18kInternational$16kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOICES FOR UTAH CHILDREN$25,000
BOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRY$10,000
RED BARN ACADEMY$5,000
HUNTSMAN CANCER CENTER$5,000
BIG CANYON FOUNDATION$2,000
YOUTHLINK$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LITTLE LAMB FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%UTAH 1033 FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%FREEDOM DOGS: $9k → 11%ASIAN ASSOCIATION: $750 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
NY
OR
PA
CA
UT
CO
TN
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 15 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
34

Total granted

$173k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+79%

Still filing today

60%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    4× · 2017–2021 · $19k · revenue +57%
  • UH
    UTAH HONOR FLIGHT
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue +30%
  • RB
    RED BARN FARMS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • FD
    FREEDOM DOGSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +27%
  • U1
    UTAH 1033 FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -20%
  • BL
    BARKING LOT
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc

We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care

Human Services
2
The Christmas Box International

The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…

Community Improvement
3
United States Fund for Unicef

The organization's mission is to relentlessly pursue a better world for every child. unicef usa advances the global mission of unicef by rallying the american public to support the world's most vulnerable children. through fundraising,…

International
4
Utah Health & Human Rights Project

The organization's mission is to help survivors of torture living in utah to heal from their physical and psychological injuries and rebuild their lives.

Health
5
Gamechanger Charity

Gamechanger leverages technology and innovation to help children and their families who encounter life threatening illnesses.

Health
6
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
7
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
8
Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council

The organization's mission is to end domestic violence in utah through advocacy, education, collaboration, and leadership. the organization is the nationally recognized domestic violence coalition for the state of utah.

Crime & Legal
9
Child Liberation Foundation Inc

The Child Liberation Foundation (CLF), founded in February 2017, is dedicated to eradicating child trafficking worldwide. In 2023, CLF expanded its mission beyond rescue operations to emphasize rehabilitation and healing for survivors of…

Human Services
10
Friends of the Children - Utah

Friends of the children utah has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Youth Development
11
Ukrainian Refugee Foundation

URF is a 501(c)(30 nonprofit based in California. We receive funds through private donations and spend them on several programs, providing aid, rescue, and relief for Ukrainian war victims in the form of cash donations for food, shelter,…

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Save the Children Federation Inc

Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Days for Girls International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUNTSMAN CANCER CENTER: $35,000 · OtherHUNTSMAN CANCER CENTERBOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRY: $22,966 · OtherBOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRYFREEDOM DOGS: $11,250 · OtherFREEDOM DOGSIndividual grant recipient: $9,875 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherRED BARN ACADEMY: $5,000 · Other+29 more: $37,125 · Other+29 moreRED BARN FARMS: $18,000 · HealthRED BARN FARMSST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDR…Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $5,000 · HealthRonald McDonal…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' …+1 more: $1,000 · HealthUtah Children: $25,000 · Civil RightsUtah Childr…BOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $18,500 · EducationUTAH HONOR FLIGHT: $18,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $250 · Public BenefitFREEDOM DOGS: $9,000 · Human ServicesUTAH 1033 FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Human ServicesLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $750 · Human ServicesYOUTHLINC: $7,500 · InternationalWomen of the World: $3,000 · InternationalDays For Girls International: $2,000 · International
Other$133,216Health$32,500Civil Rights$25,000Education$18,500Public Benefit$18,250Human Services$15,750International$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUtah Children: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBOUNTIFUL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $18,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUTAH HONOR FLIGHT: $18,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetRED BARN FARMS: $18,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM DOGS: $9,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetYOUTHLINC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH 1033 FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $4,375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWomen of the World: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKIND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $2,375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDays For Girls International: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPE RECOVERY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharityVision International: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESCUED DOG: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING YOGA: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWARRIOR SURF FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…Larry H Miller and Ga…George S and Dolores …The Community Foundat…McCarthey Family Foun…Kennecott Utah Copper…Pacificorp Foundation…Texas Instruments Fou…PROG Holdings Foundat…Utah's PromiseLawrence & Janet Dee …Dominion Energy Chari…
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · McCarthey Family Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Texas Instruments Foundation · PROG Holdings Foundation Inc · Utah's Promise · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B Girls Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B Girls Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on B Girls Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home