Skip to content

· Public charity

B Charitable Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable purposes as set forth in Sectin 501 (c)(3)such as making distributions to organizatons that are recognized as exempt from federal income tax under Code Section 501 (c)(3).

$709k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$245k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$651kPhilanthropy$132kEducation$86kInternational$63kHuman Services$53kCommunity Improvement$25kHealth$21kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $599,642, the rows itemized in this filing. The $709,202 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $109,560 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $276k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $245k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cahaba Park Church$244,681
Redeemer Community Church$38,400
Mountain Brook Community Church$35,000
Triumph of Hope$25,000
Third Lens$20,000
First Presbyterian Church of PC$15,500
Eart Path Education$15,000
Refuge 1212 Inc$15,000
Cornerstone Schools of Alabama Inc$15,000
Mwana Villages US Inc$12,500
Brookwood Baptist Church$12,041
Cathedral Church of the Advent$12,000
Not Forgotten$10,975
African Childrens Mission$10,000
Alabama Baptist Childrens Home$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Big Oak Ranch Inc: $5k → 18%Big Oak Ranch Inc: $5k → 18%Oak Tree Ministries: $17k → 16%Center for Executive Leadership: $8k → 16%Clerestory Inc: $20k → 16%Mwana Villages US Inc: $13k → 16%Mwana Villages US Inc: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$650k · 9 repeat orgs$388k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$650k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $292k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MWANA VILLAGES US INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +8%
  • UG
    UNBOUND GRACE MINISTERIES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +46%
  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $14k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CI
    CLERESTORY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -17%
  • OT
    OAK TREE MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +49%
  • TW
    THE WELLHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bless the Children Ministries Inc

To be the love of christ to uganda's orphaned and vulnerable children, equipping them to become authentic godly leaders that transform generations

International
2
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
3
Children At Heart Ministries Inc

Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.

Human Services
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Alliance for Transformational Ministry

Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.

Religion
6
Christian Services for Children in Alabama

The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.

—
7
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
8
Greater Birmingham Ministries

To serve people, build community, pursue justice.

—
9
Kingdom Global Ministries

Christian services including missions efforts, humanitarian aide, mentoring/discipleship, establishment and covering of churches, licensing/ordaining ministers, pastoral support, all domestically and internationally.

Religion
10
Mission Alabama

The mission is to mobilize churches, organizations, corporations, and government entities to create partnerships that build capacity through strategic bridges of opportunities for low-moderate income families which lead to community…

—
11
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
12
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oak Tree Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Mochary Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
13/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAHABA PARK CHURCH PCA: $418,181 · OtherCAHABA PARK CHURCH PCACORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC: $40,000 · OtherCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INCREDEEMER COMMUNITY CHURCH: $38,400 · OtherREDEEMER COMMUNITY CHURCHMountain Brook Community Church: $35,000 · Other+15 more: $178,341 · Other+15 moreMochary Foundation Inc: $85,000 · PhilanthropyMochary Found…New Hampshire Charitable Foundation: $33,457 · PhilanthropyNew Hampshire…UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $13,515 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF…MWANA VILLAGES US INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesMWANA VILLA…CLERESTORY INC: $20,025 · Human ServicesCLERESTORY …OAK TREE MINISTRIES: $17,000 · Human ServicesOAK TREE MI…NOT FORGOTTEN INC: $10,975 · Human ServicesNOT FORGOTT…BIG OAK RANCH INC: $10,025 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RAN…THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER …AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE OF CE…Kings Home Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON THREAD COMMUNITY: $5,000 · Human ServicesTRIUMPH OF HOPE: $25,000 · ReligionAFRICAN CHILDREN'S MISSION INC: $10,000 · ReligionBIGTIME MINISTRIES: $5,000 · ReligionUNBOUND GRACE MINISTERIES: $18,000 · HealthREFUGE 1212 INC: $15,000 · HealthTHE WILL KING FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · HealthTHIRD LENS CORPORATION: $20,000 · InternationalMOBILE MEDICAL DISASTER RELIEF INC: $5,245 · InternationalBLOUNT COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSANTA CRUZ WALDORF SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$709,922Philanthropy$131,972Human Services$108,525Religion$40,000Health$38,500International$25,245Education$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMochary Foundation Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation: $33,457 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIUMPH OF HOPE: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMWANA VILLAGES US INC: $22,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCLERESTORY INC: $20,025 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHIRD LENS CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetUNBOUND GRACE MINISTERIES: $18,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetOAK TREE MINISTRIES: $17,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetREFUGE 1212 INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $13,515 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNOT FORGOTTEN INC: $10,975 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $10,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN CHILDREN'S MISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMAGIC CITY WOODWORKS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOUNT COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WILL KING FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetMOBILE MEDICAL DISASTER RELIEF INC: $5,245 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKings Home Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIGTIME MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON THREAD COMMUNITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSANTA CRUZ WALDORF SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL38.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Protective Life Foundation · Nall-Whatley Foundation · The Robert and Lois Luckie Charitable Foundation · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation · The Hackney Foundation · Debardeleben Foundation Inc · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Altecstyslinger Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B Charitable Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B Charitable Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on B’s filings →

    More from the funding graph