· Public charity
B Charitable Inc
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable purposes as set forth in Sectin 501 (c)(3)such as making distributions to organizatons that are recognized as exempt from federal income tax under Code Section 501 (c)(3).
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 32 grants below total $599,642 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $709,202 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $109,560 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $79k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $276k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $245k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cahaba Park Church | $244,681 |
| Redeemer Community Church | $38,400 |
| Mountain Brook Community Church | $35,000 |
| Triumph of Hope | $25,000 |
| Third Lens | $20,000 |
| First Presbyterian Church of PC | $15,500 |
| Refuge 1212 Inc | $15,000 |
| Eart Path Education | $15,000 |
| Cornerstone Schools of Alabama Inc | $15,000 |
| Mwana Villages US Inc | $12,500 |
| Brookwood Baptist Church | $12,041 |
| Cathedral Church of the Advent | $12,000 |
| Not Forgotten | $10,975 |
| Magic City Woodworks | $10,000 |
| African Childrens Mission | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $292k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MVMWANA VILLAGES US INC2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +8%
- UGUNBOUND GRACE MINISTERIES2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +46%
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC3× · 2021–2023 · $14k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- CICLERESTORY INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -17%
- OTOAK TREE MINISTRIESgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +49%
- TWTHE WELLHOUSE INCone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be the love of christ to uganda's orphaned and vulnerable children, equipping them to become authentic godly leaders that transform generations
Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.
Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.
The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.
To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.
To serve people, build community, pursue justice.
Christian services including missions efforts, humanitarian aide, mentoring/discipleship, establishment and covering of churches, licensing/ordaining ministers, pastoral support, all domestically and internationally.
The mission is to mobilize churches, organizations, corporations, and government entities to create partnerships that build capacity through strategic bridges of opportunities for low-moderate income families which lead to community…
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oak Tree Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Mochary Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mochary Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds TRIUMPH OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds MWANA VILLAGES US INC ↗
- Who funds CLERESTORY INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD LENS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNBOUND GRACE MINISTERIES ↗
- Who funds OAK TREE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGE 1212 INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds NOT FORGOTTEN INC ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds MAGIC CITY WOODWORKS ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN CHILDREN'S MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds BLOUNT COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILL KING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE MEDICAL DISASTER RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Kings Home Inc ↗
- Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIGTIME MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Protective Life Foundation · Nall-Whatley Foundation · The Robert and Lois Luckie Charitable Foundation · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation · The Hackney Foundation · Debardeleben Foundation Inc · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Altecstyslinger Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization B Charitable Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.