Skip to content

· Private foundation

B & E Collins Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$333kCivil Rights$150kHousing & Shelter$90kHealth$80kEducation$73kYouth Development$73kAnimals$40kFood & Nutrition$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUE THE VOTE$30,000
INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE$20,000
SAFE SHELTER OF ST VRAIN VALLEY$20,000
MILA'S MIRACLE FOUNDATION$20,000
REASON FOUNDATION$10,000
NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION$10,000
ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY$10,000
COLORADO LEARNING CTR FOR HUMAN ANA$10,000
FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
FEEDING TAMPA BAY$10,000
DHARMA'S GARDEN$10,000
BELOVED ASHEVILLE$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
BROTHER WOLF ANIMAL RESCUE$10,000
CATO INSTITUTE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RES: $10k → 12%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $20k → 16%REASON FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%CATO INSTITUTE: $20k → 14%FEEDING TAMPA BAY: $10k → 13%PEAK RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $20k → 12%INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $30k → 12%SHUNPIKE THE SEATTLE PROJECT: $10k → 9%AIER: $10k → 12%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $10k → 16%REASON FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%DHARMA'S GARDEN: $20k → 12%INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $30k → 12%AIER: $10k → 12%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $10k → 16%REASON FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%CATO INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%DHARMA'S GARDEN: $20k → 12%INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $30k → 12%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $10k → 16%REASON FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CATO INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%DHARMA'S GARDEN: $10k → 12%INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $20k → 12%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $10k → 16%REASON FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CATO INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%DYNAMIC THERAPY SERVICES INC: $10k → 12%INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $20k → 12%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $3k → 16%CATO INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%DHARMA'S GARDEN: $10k → 12%INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $3k → 12%FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 14%DHARMA'S GARDEN: $10k → 12%STAND FOR CHILDREN COLORADO: $10k → 12%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE KIVA CENTER: $10k → 12%ESCUELA DE GUADALUPE: $10k → 12%FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 14%JUNKYARD SOCIAL CLUB: $10k → 12%ESCUELA DE GUADALUPE: $3k → 12%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MA
CA
CO
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of B & E Collins Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

B & E Collins Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$747k · 11 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$747k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+80%

Still filing today

73%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TRUE THE VOTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +20%
  • TR
    THE REASON FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +41%
  • SS
    SAFE SHELTER OF ST VRAIN VALLEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • PR
    PEAK RESEARCH INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +80%
  • ED
    ESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • SF
    STAND FOR CHILDREN COLORADO
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
R Street Institute

The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…

Education
3
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
Freedom Forum Institute Inc

The mission of the freedom forum institute is to champion the five freedoms of the first amendment through education and entertainment.

—
6
Techfreedom

Techfreedom's mission is to promote the progress of technology that improves the human condition and expands individual capacity to choose. techfreedom advances the freedoms that make experimentation, entrepreneurship and investment…

Science & Tech
7
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
8
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
9
Litigators for Liberty Network

Support public interest litigators by leveraging resources and creating opportunities for collaboration to advance freedom under the rule of law.

Crime & Legal
10
Institute for Defense Analyses

The institute for defense analyses is organized for the purpose of applied research. the institute for defense analyses provides independent and objective scientific and technological expertise to assist national security decision-makers…

Science & Tech
11
Future Tech Insights Inc

The organization provides public education on artificial intelligence.

Public Benefit
12
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mila's Miracle Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFE SHELTER OF ST VRAIN VALLEY: $80,000 · OtherSAFE SHELTER OF ST VRAIN VALLEYDHARMA'S GARDEN: $70,000 · OtherDHARMA'S GARDENCOLORADO LEARNING CTR FOR HUMAN ANA: $60,000 · OtherCOLORADO LEARNING CTR FOR HUMAN ANAFREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherFREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INCAIER: $20,000 · OtherAIERESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $13,250 · Other+10 more: $100,000 · Other+10 moreINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $133,250 · Public BenefitINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTECATO INSTITUTE: $60,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTETHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATIONTRUE THE VOTE INC: $140,000 · Civil RightsTRUE THE VOTE INCTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationTHE REASON F…PEAK RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $20,000 · EducationPEAK RESEARC…ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $63,250 · Arts & CultureARTISTS F…JUNKYARD SOCIAL CLUB: $10,000 · Arts & CultureJUNKYARD …MILA'S MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $10,000 · Animals
Other$363,250Public Benefit$213,250Civil Rights$140,000Education$100,000Arts & Culture$73,250Health$20,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUE THE VOTE INC: $140,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $133,250 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE SHELTER OF ST VRAIN VALLEY: $80,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $63,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMILA'S MIRACLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPEAK RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KIVA CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNKYARD SOCIAL CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUE THE VOTE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFE SHELTER OF ST VRAIN VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILA'S MIRACLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEAK RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Brother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE KIVA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNKYARD SOCIAL CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B & E Collins Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B & E Collins Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Artists for Humanity Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on B & E Collins’ filings →

More from the funding graph