Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aurora Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$59kEducation$51kHuman Services$47kInternational$24kArts & Culture$24kReligion$22kCivil Rights$20kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,205
The McLean Crew Club$5,100
Kibir Desta Medical Foundation$5,000
NETWORK FOR GOOD$5,000
SEVATRUCK FOUNDATION$5,000
SPARSH$3,000
GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN$2,000
Durga Temple of Virginia$1,353
New Futures$501
GoFundMe$500
River Church Baltimore$250
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASHA FOR WOMEN: $8k → 8%GIRLS WHO CODE: $1k → 17%New Futures: $501 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 19 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
21

Total granted

$305k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
-5%

Still filing today

37%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    3× · 2018–2021 · $29k · revenue +17%
  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
    4× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue +102%
  • LC
    Literacy Council of Northern Virginia Inc
    4× · 2017–2022 · $22k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • GF
    GOONJ FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • G
    GREATNONPROFITS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -51%
  • WD
    WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +159%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
2
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
3
Development Data Lab Inc

DDL`s Work is designed to widen public access to and use of economic, demographic and physical data that describes, defines and seeks to alleviate poverty, especially in the developing world

International
4
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
5
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Equal Access International

To create positive social change for millions of under-served people across the developing world by providing critically needed information and education through innovative media, appropriate technology and direct community engagement.

Health
7
Water for Good

Water for good's mission is to transform lives through sustainable access to safe water as well as improved sanitation and hygiene in the places that need it most.

International
8
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
9
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
10
The Clear Fund

Givewell is dedicated to finding and funding outstanding giving opportunities in global health and development, sharing the full details of our analysis with everyone for free.

Philanthropy
11
Development Gateway Inc

Development gateway (dg) creates tools and design processes that help collect, visualize, and use data for a more equitable world. for 20 years, we have built systems, dashboards, and tools to create more effective, open, and engaging…

International
12
Ffwd

FFWD accelerates the growth of technology nonprofits by providing financial and human capital to help scale technology solutions for education, environmental, health, and human rights issues.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Children; the most unlike its peers is Kibir Desta Medical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
10/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $42,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $30,000 · OtherSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USALiteracy Council of Northern Virginia Inc: $22,000 · OtherLiteracy Council of Northern Virginia IncSPARSH INC: $20,050 · OtherSPARSH INCACT BLUE: $19,500 · OtherACT BLUEIndividual grant recipient: $16,455 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASHA FOR WOMEN: $15,000 · OtherOM PRAKASH: $11,603 · OtherNETWORK FOR GOOD: $10,000 · Other+24 more: $67,464 · Other+24 morePRATHAM USA: $29,000 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL SHOUT: $3,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyGREATNONPROFITS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $5,023 · Arts & CultureHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $4,624 · Arts & CultureSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $23,500 · HealthKibir Desta Medical Foundation: $5,000 · HealthGIVE2ASIA: $10,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,631 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalSevaTruck Foundation: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGOONJ FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$288,072Philanthropy$32,500Arts & Culture$29,147Health$28,500International$16,131Food & Nutrition$10,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRATHAM USA: $29,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $23,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLiteracy Council of Northern Virginia Inc: $22,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSevaTruck Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGOONJ FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetGREATNONPROFITS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $9,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASHIYANAA INC: $7,721 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,631 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCLEAN CREW CLUB INC: $5,100 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $5,023 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $4,624 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL SHOUT: $3,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTOUCHING LIVES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY EQUALITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Council of Northern Virginia Inc ↗
  • Who funds SevaTruck Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GOONJ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATNONPROFITS ↗
  • Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHIYANAA INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MCLEAN CREW CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Kibir Desta Medical Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SHOUT ↗
  • Who funds TOUCHING LIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aurora Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aurora Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aurora Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph