Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Aurelia Konrad Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$347kArts & Culture$107kHuman Services$70kInternational$26kHealth$20kReligion$17kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Federation$60,000
Jewish Commnity Center$12,000
American Technion Society$2,000
Nine Network of Public Media$2,000
Jewish National Fund$2,000
Yiddish Book Center$2,000
Hillel International$2,000
Forest Park Forever$2,000
Missouri History Museum$2,000
Magen David Adom$2,000
The Kaufman Fund$1,000
Give Kids a Smile$1,000
St Louis Zoo$1,000
Fathers Family Support Center of ST$1,000
Eye Academy$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Kaufman Fund: $1k → 11%The Kaufman Fund: $1k → 11%The Kaufman Fund: $1k → 11%The Kaufman Fund: $1k → 11%Jewish Commnity Center: $12k → 11%Jewish Commnity Center: $11k → 11%Jewish Commnity Center: $10k → 11%Jewish Commnity Center: $10k → 11%Jewish Commnity Center: $9k → 11%Jewish Commnity Center: $9k → 11%Next Dor SL: $1k → 21%Next Dor SL: $1k → 21%Next Dor SL: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
MO
KY
DC
LA
MS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$506k · 29 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
2

Total granted

$506k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+159%

Still filing today

66%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthEnvironmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +43%
  • FP
    Forest Park Forever Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +137%
  • MH
    MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ILLINOISgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue +159%
  • EA
    Eye Academy
    one grant, 2025 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City

To sustain and enhance jewish life at home and around the world.

Philanthropy
5
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
The Jewish Publication Society

Our mission has always been to enhance jewish literacy through the publication of great books.

8
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
9
American Jewish Historical Society

See schedule o - the american jewish historical society (the "society") is the oldest ethnic, cultural archive in the united states. the society provides access to more than 30 million documents and 50,000 books, photographs, art and…

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
11
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
12
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Shaving Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%5%5–10yr16%9%10–20yr15%18%20–35yr16%32%35–55yr24%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr16%2%10–20yr15%8%20–35yr16%18%35–55yr24%70%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,467

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Jewish Federation — $295,800 · OtherJewish Federation+15 more — $64,000 · Other+15 moreJewish Federation of St Louis — $100,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation …+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $60,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMU…The Kaufman Fund — $4,000 · Human ServicesThe Kaufman …NEXT DOR STL — $3,000 · Human ServicesMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureART ST LOUIS — $5,000 · Arts & CultureINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE — $2,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $10,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,000 · InternationalSHAVING ISRAEL — $6,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC — $6,000 · HealthLIVING WELL FOUNDATION — $6,000 · HealthForest Park Forever Inc — $10,000 · Environment
Other$359,800Philanthropy$101,000Human Services$67,000Arts & Culture$42,000International$36,000Health$12,000Environment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJewish Federation of St Louis — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATION — $7,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT — $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING WELL FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetGIVE KIDS A SMILE INC — $6,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHAVING ISRAEL — $6,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetART ST LOUIS — $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe Kaufman Fund — $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNEXT DOR STL — $3,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetREADY READERS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc
  • Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC
  • Who funds ST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT
  • Who funds LIVING WELL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS A SMILE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC
  • Who funds LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds SHAVING ISRAEL
  • Who funds ART ST LOUIS
  • Who funds The Kaufman Fund
  • Who funds NEXT DOR STL
  • Who funds READY READERS
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kranzberg Family Charitable FoundationMO17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kranzberg Family Charitable Foundation · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Sanford and Gloria Spitzer Family Foundation · The Silk Foundation Northern Trust · Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundation · The Rubin Family Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Aurelia Konrad Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aurelia Konrad Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Aurelia Konrad Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph