Skip to content

· Public charity

Aunt Rita's Foundation

Aunt ritas foundation has been pursuing since 2005 its mission to end hiv in arizona, but has a rich history dating back to the 1980s.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$623kHuman Services$173kCivil Rights$166kInternational$53kYouth Development$25kCommunity Improvement$8k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,590
Median grant
2
States reached
$357k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE-N-TEN$7,590
CAN COMMUNITY HEALTH$7,590
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND -BI$7,590
VALLEYWISE HEALTH$7,590
SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR HIVADS$7,590
TERROS HEALTH$7,590
EBONY HOUSE$7,590
THE QUEER CENTER$7,590
CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA$7,590
SOUTHWEST RECOVERY ALLIANCE$7,590
NORTHLAND CARES$7,590
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Area Agency on Aging: $10k → 11%Area Agency on Aging: $10k → 11%Chicanos Por La Causa: $133k → 11%Chicanos Por La Causa: $10k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $10k → 11%Chicanos Por La Causa: $10k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $8k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$972k · 16 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$972k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+175%

Still filing today

88%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $177k · revenue +184%
  • 1I
    1N10 INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $176k · revenue +71%
  • PC
    Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation
    4× · 2019–2022 · $71k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • HC
    HIV Care Directions
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • PS
    PHOENIX SHANTI GROUP INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -61%
  • SP
    Sonoran Prevention Worksgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +175%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
2
Southern Arizona Aids Foundation

To promote health, well-being, and social justice for those living with HIV, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities marginalized by society.

Health
3
Horizon Health and Wellness Inc

Horizon health and wellness inc's mission is to provide strength-based, culturally sensitive integrated health services by partnering with families and individuals to manage challenges and support their recovery. hhw developed an (cont'd…

Health
4
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
5
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
6
Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona

The Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona (CareAz) is a community-based organization dedicated to reducing the harmful effects of substance use disorder through comprehensive prevention, treatment, recovery, and reentry support.…

Health
7
Canyonlands Community Health Center

The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.

—
8
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
9
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
10
Dap Health Inc

To enhance and promote the health and wellbeing of the community.

Health
11
Lowell Community Health Center Inc

Lowell community health center's mission is to provide caring, quality, and culturally competent health services to the people of greater lowell, regardless of their financial status; to reduce health disparities and enhance the health of…

Health
12
Southwest Chemical Dependency

Southwest Chemical Dependency's mission is to promote the health and general well-being of individuals, families and communities impacted by the abuse of alcohol and other drugs as well as co-occurring mental health issues

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valleywise Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Shot in the Dark Az. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $71,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital FoundationPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC): $60,621 · HealthPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER H…EBONY HOUSE INC: $60,416 · HealthEBONY HOUSE INCCAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $50,621 · HealthCAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INCSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $47,491 · HealthSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INCTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA: $46,000 · HealthTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONAVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $41,000 · HealthVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATIONSHOT IN THE DARK AZ: $29,994 · HealthSHOT IN THE DARK AZ+2 more: $17,590 · Health1N10 INC: $176,452 · Civil Rights1N10 INCSOUTHWEST RECOVERY ALLIANCE: $45,621 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST RECOVERY ALLIA…CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $177,388 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA …AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION ONE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesAREA AGENCY ON AGING R…TERROS INC: $60,621 · OtherTERROS INCNATIVE HEALTH: $46,000 · OtherNATIVE HEALTHVALLEYWISE HEALTH: $14,621 · OtherVALLEYWISE HEALTHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND -BI: $14,621 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL …HIV Care Directions: $11,000 · OtherHIV Care DirectionsPHOENIX SHANTI GROUP INC: $10,000 · OtherPHOENIX SHANTI GROUP…HIV CARE DIRECTIONS AGENCY-AGING: $7,031 · OtherHEAL INTERNATIONAL: $7,031 · OtherNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY HSE: $7,031 · OtherSHOT IN THE DARK: $7,031 · Other+1 more: $500 · OtherQueer Center: $7,590 · Community Improvement
Health$424,733Civil Rights$222,073Human Services$207,388Other$185,487Community Improvement$7,590

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $177,388 over 6y, 0.0% of budget1N10 INC: $176,452 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $71,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC): $60,621 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTERROS INC: $60,621 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEBONY HOUSE INC: $60,416 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $50,621 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $47,491 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA: $46,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIVE HEALTH: $46,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST RECOVERY ALLIANCE: $45,621 over 4y, 16% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION ONE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHOT IN THE DARK AZ: $29,994 over 3y, 71% of budgetPHOENIX SHANTI GROUP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSonoran Prevention Works: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetQueer Center: $7,590 over 1y, 34% of budgetNORTHLAND CARES: $7,590 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
  • Who funds 1N10 INC ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC) ↗
  • Who funds TERROS INC ↗
  • Who funds EBONY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST RECOVERY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOT IN THE DARK AZ ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX SHANTI GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Sonoran Prevention Works ↗
  • Who funds Queer Center ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND CARES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ22.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Mercy Care · Arizona Family Health Partnership · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aunt Rita's Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aunt Rita's Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Can Community Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aunt Rita's’ filings →

More from the funding graph