Skip to content

· Public charity

Aultman Health Foundation Group Return

The mission of aultman health foundation and its subsidiaries (collectively, "aultman") is to lead our community to improved health.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$17MHousing & Shelter$511kEducation$209kCommunity Improvement$151kRecreation & Sports$67kArts & Culture$48kHuman Services$7kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,894,868, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,475,623 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $580,755 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.8M
$8,568
Median grant
1
States reached
$546M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$1,844,900
ALLIANCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$15,000
AUNT SUSIE'S CANCER WELLNESS CENTER$9,000
EN-RICH-MENT$8,568
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA$6,600
SHE ELEVATES$5,400
HEARTLAND EDUCATION COMMUNITY INC$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA: $7k → 12%GENTLEBROOK: $6k → 13%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION CANTON OHIO: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 15 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$17M
$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+28%

Still filing today

67%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    My Community Health Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15M · revenue +442% · 50% of their budget
  • AF
    Alliance Family Health Center Inc
    5× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +51% · 29% of their budget
  • TO
    THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $47k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • SE
    STARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $97k · revenue +386%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FOOTBALL MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +18%
  • AH
    ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +395%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

—
2
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
3
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—
4
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
5
School Choice Ohio Inc

The mission of school choice ohio is to protect and expand children's educational options through ensuring choice in quality schools and other places of learning, thereby supporting systemic reform of k-12 education across the state.

Education
6
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
7
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
8
Arc Group Employment Services

To provide employment opportunities to central ohioans with developmental disabilities.

Employment
9
Akron Community Foundation

To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…

Philanthropy
10
Greater Akron Chamber

To promote business in the tri-county area

—
11
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

—
12
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Health Stark County Inc; the most unlike its peers is She Elevates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

My Community Health Center: $14,950,798 · HealthMy Community Health CenterAlliance Family Health Center Inc: $1,288,178 · HealthAlliance Family Health Center Inc+3 more: $70,000 · HealthHOF VILLAGE IRG REALTY ADVISORS LLC: $540,365 · OtherPREMIER HEALTH ASSOCIATES INC: $273,980 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · Other+13 more: $175,550 · OtherSTARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $96,666 · Community ImprovementTeam NEO Foundation: $30,000 · Community ImprovementAlliance Area Development: $14,000 · Community ImprovementTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $46,667 · EducationWalsh University Inc: $40,000 · EducationSTARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $15,000 · EducationNATIONAL FOOTBALL MUSEUM INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureARTS IN STARK: $25,000 · Arts & CultureEN-RICH-MENT: $14,268 · Arts & CultureYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CANTON OHIO: $9,850 · Human ServicesTUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA FOUNDATION INC: $6,600 · Human ServicesAhead Inc: $6,375 · Human ServicesGENTLEBROOK INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $14,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$16,308,976Other$1,029,895Community Improvement$140,666Education$101,667Arts & Culture$79,268Human Services$28,825Housing & Shelter$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMy Community Health Center: $14,950,798 over 8y, 50% of budgetAlliance Family Health Center Inc: $1,288,178 over 5y, 29% of budgetTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $46,667 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOOTBALL MUSEUM INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAUNT SUSIE'S CANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $18,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCHILD & ADOLESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $17,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetEN-RICH-MENT: $14,268 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetAlliance Area Development: $14,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $14,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBeacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetStark County Convention & Visitors' Bureau: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CANTON OHIO: $9,850 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANTON REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF OHIO INC: $6,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA FOUNDATION INC: $6,600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPEGASUS FARM: $6,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAhead Inc: $6,375 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetGENTLEBROOK INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShe Elevates Inc: $5,400 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHEARTLAND EDUCATION COMMUNITY INC: $5,400 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sisters of Charity Foundation of CantonOH30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Stark Community Foundation · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · North Canton Medical Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Massillon Rotary Foundation Trust · Aultman Health Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · Health Foundation of Greater Massillon · Greater Alliance Foundation Inc · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aultman Health Foundation Group Return funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aultman Health Foundation Group Return. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aultman Health Foundation Group Return’s filings →

    More from the funding graph