How much did AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN grant in FY2024?

Health$16MCommunity Improvement$141kEducation$102kArts & Culture$79kHuman Services$29kHousing & Shelter$14kRecreation & Sports$7kYouth Development$5kOther$1.0M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

studentsoficbusinessscholarshipcontributionscorporatemembers

2019

summerpayment resultresult golfgolf outingouting heldheld behalfbehalf entity

2020

hartvillemeadowslocatedfundedwaiverdevelopmentally disabledwest lafayette

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

children

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $35k
$10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$250k+1 grant · $1.8M

$8,568

Median grant

States reached

$546M

Total assets

Largest grants

MY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$1,844,900
ALLIANCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$15,000
AUNT SUSIE'S CANCER WELLNESS CENTER$9,000
EN-RICH-MENT$8,568
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA$6,600
HEARTLAND EDUCATION COMMUNITY INC$5,400
SHE ELEVATES$5,400

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$17M · 15 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +170% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$17M

$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+170%

+31%

Still filing today

67%

82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
MY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
8× · 2017–2024 · $15M · revenue +442% · 50% of their budget
AF
ALLIANCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
5× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +206% · 29% of their budget
OF
OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES
2× · 2017–2018 · $47k · revenue +11%

Funded once

SD
STARK DEVELOPMENT BOARD INCgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $97k · revenue +166%
AH
ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTYgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +395%
NF
NATIONAL FOOTBALL MUSEUM INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

OhioHealth Corporation

Our mission is to improve the health of those we serve.

Health

Shaker Square Area Development Corp

To provide leadership and action needed to foster well maintained, economically strong neighborhoods to the greater Shaker Square residents and merchants.

Community Improvement

Ohio Business Leadership Network

—

Arc Group Employment Services

To provide employment opportunities to central ohioans with developmental disabilities.

Employment

Ohio Living Communities

To provide older adults with caring and quality services toward the enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well being consistent with the christian gospel.

Human Services

Tri-County Jobs for Ohio's

To help at-risk students and out of school participants complete their education and successfully transition to employment at a livable wage or post-secondary job training.

Employment

Greater Akron Chamber

To promote business in the tri-county area.

—

United Way of Greater Stark County

We build our community's capacity to alleviate the impact of poverty and empower families to unleash their potential.

Philanthropy

The Healthcare Connection Inc

Federally qualified health center that provides primary healthcare services to the medically indigent population of hamilton county, ohio.

—

Stark Housing Network Inc

Ending homelessness in stark county ohio.

Human Services

Southern Ohio Medical Center

Southern ohio medical center is an acute health care system located in portsmouth, ohio. somc's exempt purpose is to serve south central ohio and northeastern kentucky with state-of-the-art facilities and health care technologies.

Health

Economic Development Alliance

The economic development alliance of st. clair county creates economic prosperity by growing companies and cultivating vibrant communities, developing a workforce with 21st century skills, and marketing our regional advantages. we are…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Health Stark County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arts in Stark. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/35

the rest of the field

11%

613/5,826

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/28

Grantees still filing

22/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$16,308,976Other$1,029,895Community Improvement$140,666Education$101,667Arts & Culture$79,268Human Services$28,825Housing & Shelter$14,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH41× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Aultman Health Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · Timken Foundation of Canton · North Canton Medical Foundation · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · Cleveland Clinic Mercy Hospital · Premier Bank Foundation · Alliance Community Hospital

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 812171085 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 50% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Aultman Health Foundation Group Return?

Find your warmest path to Aultman Health Foundation Group Return through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Aultman Health Foundation Group Return?

More from the funding graph

AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Aultman Health Foundation Group Return?

More from the funding graph