· Public charity
Aultman Health Foundation Group Return
The mission of aultman health foundation and its subsidiaries (collectively, "aultman") is to lead our community to improved health.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $1,894,868 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,475,623 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $580,755 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $1,844,900 |
| ALLIANCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | $15,000 |
| AUNT SUSIE'S CANCER WELLNESS CENTER | $9,000 |
| EN-RICH-MENT | $8,568 |
| TUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA | $6,600 |
| SHE ELEVATES | $5,400 |
| HEARTLAND EDUCATION COMMUNITY INC | $5,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMy Community Health Center8× · 2017–2024 · $15M · revenue +442% · 50% of their budget
- AFAlliance Family Health Center Inc5× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +51% · 29% of their budget
- TOTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES2× · 2017–2018 · $47k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- SESTARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $97k · revenue +386%
- NFNATIONAL FOOTBALL MUSEUM INCone grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +18%
- AHACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +395%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
The mission of school choice ohio is to protect and expand children's educational options through ensuring choice in quality schools and other places of learning, thereby supporting systemic reform of k-12 education across the state.
To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.
The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.
To provide employment opportunities to central ohioans with developmental disabilities.
To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…
To promote business in the tri-county area
To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.
Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Health Stark County Inc and the most unlike its peers is She Elevates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds My Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds Alliance Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds STARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOOTBALL MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT NEW LEADERS FOR OHIO SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Team NEO Foundation ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN STARK ↗
- Who funds AUNT SUSIE'S CANCER WELLNESS CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILD & ADOLESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds STARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds EN-RICH-MENT ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds Alliance Area Development ↗
- Who funds Beacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc ↗
- Who funds Stark County Convention & Visitors' Bureau ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CANTON OHIO ↗
- Who funds CANTON REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds TUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PEGASUS FARM ↗
- Who funds Ahead Inc ↗
- Who funds GENTLEBROOK INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS OF TUSCARAWAS & CARROLL COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds She Elevates Inc ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND EDUCATION COMMUNITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Stark Community Foundation · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · North Canton Medical Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Massillon Rotary Foundation Trust · Aultman Health Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · Health Foundation of Greater Massillon · Greater Alliance Foundation Inc · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aultman Health Foundation Group Return funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.