How much does Aultman Health Foundation give?

Aultman Health Foundation reported 17 itemized grants totaling $1,537,434, out of $1,592,246 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 28 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Aultman Health Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (24%), Community Improvement (21%), Health (19%).

Who are Aultman Health Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: United Way of Greater Stark County ($1.5M), National Football Museum Inc ($958k), Access Health Stark County Inc ($811k).

Does Aultman Health Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Aultman Health Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Stark Community Foundation, Hoover Foundation Income Account, Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton.

Where is Aultman Health Foundation based?

Aultman Health Foundation is based in OH.

Aultman Health Foundation

Aultman Health Foundation at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Aultman Health Foundation

The mission of AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION is to "lead our community to improved health."

$1.6M

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$333k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.1MCommunity Improvement$1.9MHealth$1.7MRecreation & Sports$1.2MArts & Culture$1.0MEducation$507kHuman Services$274kYouth Development$93kOther$0

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 17 grants below total $1,537,434, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,592,246 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $54,812 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k8 grants · $157k
$50k–250k6 grants · $770k
$250k+2 grants · $604k

$45,000

Median grant

States reached

$625M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
AULTMAN COLLEGE	$333,441
ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY	$270,239
NATIONAL FOOTBALL MUSEUM	$239,000
UNITED WAY GREATER STARK COUNTY INC	$203,863
CANTON REGIONAL CHAMBER	$116,891
STARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD	$100,000
ARTS IN STARK	$60,000
THE NORTH CANTON MEDICAL FOUNDATION	$50,000
COMMUNITY BUILDING PARTNERSHIP	$45,000
STARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP	$20,000
ALLIANCE AREA DEVELOPMENT	$20,000
AKRON CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK	$20,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION	$15,000
TEAM NEO FOUNDATION	$15,000
BUCKEYE COUNCIL INC	$11,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$7.7M · 31 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.7M

$879k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%

+3%

Still filing today

74%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $333k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NF
NATIONAL FOOTBALL MUSEUM INC
5× · 2019–2024 · $958k · revenue +18%
AH
ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $811k · revenue +226% · 32% of their budget
SE
STARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC
5× · 2019–2024 · $600k · revenue +37%

Funded once

IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2020 · $444k
MC
My Community Health Centergraduated
one grant, 2022 · $154k · revenue +42%
TE
THE EYE CLINIC INC
one grant, 2021 · $75k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Greater Akron Chamber

To promote business in the tri-county area

—

Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—

Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—

Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—

Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

—

Akron Community Foundation

To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…

Philanthropy

Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement

Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—

Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy

Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement

Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—

Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stark Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/33

Grantees still filing

24/33

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$3,312,534Philanthropy$1,462,617Arts & Culture$1,418,745Community Improvement$1,125,700Health$1,108,246Education$294,932Human Services$221,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH42.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Timken Foundation of Canton · North Canton Medical Foundation · Massillon Rotary Foundation Trust · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · The Huntington Foundation · Aultman Health Foundation Group Return

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aultman Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aultman Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Aultman Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home