Skip to content

Ohio · Private foundation

Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$45,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$45,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$389k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$75k0%
FY20241$55k0%
FY20233$55k33%
FY20222$30k50%
FY20214$65k75%
FY20203$32k33%
FY20191$5k0%
FY20184$47k100%
87% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$207kEnvironment$25kRecreation & Sports$25kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$11kCrime & Legal$5kYouth Development$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($178k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund with peer funders

About Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund

How much does Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund give?
Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund reported 2 grants totaling $75,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (52%), Environment (6%), Recreation & Sports (6%).
Who are Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Western Reserve Historical Society ($130k), Akron Art Museum ($55k), Friends of Glendale Cemetery ($7k).
Does Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Akron Community Foundation, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund based?
Augusta W & J Belle Bowman Fund is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Augusta W & J Belle Bowman’s filings →

More from the funding graph