Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
13
Grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

89% of Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Nature Conservancy, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 12 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’23
12
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$2,000,000
States reached, FY2024
11
Total assets, FY2024
$48M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Environment$2.2MArts & Culture$100kAnimals$51kEducation$20k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
OR
WY
NJ
CA
UT
VA
HI
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Blackfoot Challenge Inc$140,00014%
Creative Visions Foundation$100,00011%
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation$45,00020%
French American School of Puget Sound$20,00020%
Hawkwatch International Inc$10,00011%
Teton Raptor Center$10,00010%
Hawaii Wildlife Center$10,00011%
Wild Bird Fund Inc$8,00010%
Animals In Distress Inc$5,00017%
Austin Bat Refuge$5,00013%
Blue Mountain Wildlife$5,00012%
The Raptor Trust$5,00010%
Rooster Haus Rescue$3,00012%

What it could do for these grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBlackfoot Challenge Inc: $140,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCreative Visions Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAquarium of the Pacific Corporation: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFrench American School of Puget Sound: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHawkwatch International Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTeton Raptor Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHawaii Wildlife Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWild Bird Fund Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAnimals In Distress Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetAustin Bat Refuge: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBlue Mountain Wildlife: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetThe Raptor Trust: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRooster Haus Rescue: $3,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation

How much does Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation give?
Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation reported 13 grants totaling $2,236,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (93%), Arts & Culture (4%), Animals (2%).
Who are Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Blackfoot Challenge Inc ($140k), Creative Visions Foundation ($100k), Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation ($45k).
Does Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation based?
Attwood Williams Charitable Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Attwood Williams’ filings →

More from the funding graph