How much did ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC grant in FY2025?

ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC reported 23 grants totaling $445,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC based?

ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC is based in GA.

ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC

Atlanta charity clays produces an annual charity event for shooting and field sports enthusiasts generating substantial net contributions for children's charities.

$445k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$99k

Largest

01What you fund

0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Human Services$990kHealth$888kEducation$274kPhilanthropy$202kCrime & Legal$91kCommunity Improvement$77kYouth Development$72kRecreation & Sports$28kEnvironment$27kOther$284k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

aspectspersonfullgreatpromotingconservationwhole

2020

purpositysummercsgmilitaryyouthunderservedmedical care

2021

purposityhealth carehealthysummercsgmilitaryinspire

2022

health carescholarshipstrainrisk childrencurenfwithjackhealthycancer

2023

forestryencouragehealth careadultsscholarshipstrainrisk children

2024

forestryteensencouragehungerhelpscorporationwellness

2025

teenshelpshungerengagingachieveself-sufficiencyskills

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k5 grants · $29k
$10k–50k17 grants · $317k
$50k–250k1 grant · $99k

$13,982

Median grant

States reached

$632k

Total assets

Largest grants

SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND$98,806
SKYLAND TRAIL$28,908
STAR C$27,956
CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND$26,562
EAGLE RANCH$26,562
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$25,169
CHRIS 180$25,166
ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$22,372
FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES TOGETHER (FACT)$17,680
YOUTH VILLAGES$13,982
COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC$13,982
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$13,982
CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$13,978
A PLUS SQUASH$13,281
KATE'S CLUB$13,281

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $990k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 8%. 70% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.7M · 36 repeat orgs$231k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.7M

$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%

+23%

Still filing today

92%

90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SO
SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND
8× · 2018–2025 · $458k · revenue +175%
SO
SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY
8× · 2018–2025 · $242k · revenue +98%
TS
THE SHEPHERD CENTER
6× · 2020–2025 · $134k · revenue +1364% · 63% of their budget

Funded once

TS
THE SHEPHERD CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $73k · revenue +68%
CN
CHATTAHOOCHEE NATURE CENTER INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $27k · revenue +53%
CH
CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA
one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Georgia Center for Child Advocacy Inc

The Georgia center for child advocacy's mission is to champion the needs of sexually and severely physically abused children through prevention, intervention, therapy, and collaboration.

Human Services

Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch funds & supports children's cancer research & provides education & resources to all those affected by children's cancer.

Health

Gamechanger Charity

Gamechanger leverages technology and innovation to help children and their families who encounter life threatening illnesses.

Health

Global Fund for Children

To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.

Arts & Culture

The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health

Georgia Care Connection Office Inc

See schedule o for complete description.the mission of georgia cares is to ensure that child sex trafficking victims receive quality care and services in the state of georgia. georgia cares is the single, statewide coordinating agency to…

—

Kidspeace National Centers of Georgia

Residential treatment for children facing crisis.

Human Services

Children's Trust of South Carolina

Children's trust is the only statewide organization focused on preventing child abuse and neglect in south carolina. it leads and supports a network of community-based organizations, which share the belief that all children should thrive,…

Human Services

Carolina Children's Charity Inc

Grants to individuals to support the prevention and the amelioration of the effects of birth defects and childhood diseases. patient aide-specific assistance to individuals for patient care and medical assistance for childhood diseases and…

Health

American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health

Children's Foundation of America

To provide an opportunity for every person to help children heal, learn and thrive.

Education

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Group Return

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation for Greater and the most unlike its peers is Chris 180 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/47

the rest of the field

18%

2,918/16,016

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

45 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

43/45

Grantees still filing

32/45

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$989,898Health$888,389Education$273,709Philanthropy$202,354Other$410,899Crime & Legal$91,236Community Improvement$77,336

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for GreaterGA42.1× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Goizueta Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · THDF II Inc DBA · The Rich Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AUTISM FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 581626622 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on AUTISM FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 75% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Atlanta Charity Clays Inc?

Find your warmest path to Atlanta Charity Clays Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

45 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Atlanta Charity Clays Inc?

More from the funding graph

ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

45 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Atlanta Charity Clays Inc?

More from the funding graph