Skip to content

· Private foundation

Atkinson Ells Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$22kHealth$9kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$3kYouth Development$3kRecreation & Sports$2kFood & Nutrition$800Housing & Shelter$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$67k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Milwaukee Public Schools Foundation$2,000
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin$1,500
Camp Manitowish$1,000
Bentley Village Foundation$1,000
College of Idaho$1,000
Notre Dame Middle School$1,000
United Methodist Chirldren's Services$800
University School of Milwaukee$700
Curative Workshop$600
Individual grant recipient$500
The Next Door Foundation$500
Milwaukee Domes Alliance$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%United Methodist Children's Services: $1k → 17%United Methodist Children's Services: $800 → 17%United Methodist Childrens Services: $700 → 17%United Methodist Children's Services: $700 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41k · 13 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$41k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+94%

Still filing today

77%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +73%
  • THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +42%
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +253%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $900
  • IS
    Interfaith Sanctuary of Boise ID
    one grant, 2021 · $700
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Jewish Day School Inc

Where academic excellence and jewish values prepare children for a lifetime of success, leadership and engagement with the world.

—
2
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
3
Woodlands School Inc

Woodlands school, inc. is a public charter non-profit school authorized through the univerity of wisconsin-milwaukee using a character-based education approach to prepare children for lifelong learning in a rapidly changing world.

Education
4
Wisconsin Montessori Society Inc

Mission: educating youngsters to become an informed, committed, and difference-making generation. vision: educating children to graduate as informed, engaged, ethically minded citizens of the world that they inherit. purpose: milwaukee…

Education
5
Madison Academy Inc

Private school dedicated to education of children from pk4 through grade 12.

—
6
Millbrook School

In a community where every student is known and needed, millbrook prepares its students for college and lives of meaning and consequence by instilling the values of respect, integrity, service, stewardship, and curiosity.

Education
7
Madison Community Montessori School Inc

Respecting children and their natural joy of discovery.

Education
8
Michigan Montessori Intenationale Inc

Children will discover their unique potential by living the Montessori lifestyle hand in hand with parents and staff.

Education
9
Downtown Montessori Academy Inc

To create a montessori environment where the child's early experiences with learning will help him or her to become a self-confident, competent, cooperative adult.

Education
10
Montessori Institute of Milwaukee Inc

Montessori institute teaches and develops programs to montessori instructors to educate them as to montessori teaching methods

—
11
Milwaukee Math and Science Academy Inc

The mission of milwaukee math and science academy, inc. is to create a learning community in which:-teachers, parents and students work together to develop young people who are confident and achieve academic excellence in a powerful…

Education
12
Meridian Public Charter School

The mission of meridian public charter school is to inspire a passion for learning in our students and to help them build their self-confidence and self-respect through academic achievement. continued on schedule o.meridian public charter…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Next Door Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Speak Your Silence Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INC: $5,100 · OtherNOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INCIndividual grant recipient: $2,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $2,800 · OtherCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INCSpeak Your Silence Inc: $2,000 · OtherSpeak Your Silence IncCurative Workshop: $1,500 · OtherCurative WorkshopIndividual grant recipient: $900 · OtherUnited Methodist Chirldren's Services: $800 · OtherInterfaith Sanctuary of Boise ID: $700 · Other+3 more: $1,400 · Other+3 moreTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $4,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL …RIVERSTONE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC: $2,500 · EducationRIVERSTONE INTERNATION…BENTLEY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 · EducationBENTLEY VILLAGE FOUNDA…The College of Idaho Inc: $1,000 · EducationThe College of Idaho I…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,900 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $400 · HealthTHE ANDREW MCDO…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,900 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE PUBL…NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsMILWAUKEE DOMES ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $3,200 · Human Services
Other$18,000Education$9,200Health$6,300Philanthropy$5,900Recreation & Sports$3,500Human Services$3,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $3,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $2,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSTONE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSpeak Your Silence Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBENTLEY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE DOMES ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSTONE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Speak Your Silence Inc ↗
  • Who funds BENTLEY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE DOMES ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Atkinson Ells Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atkinson Ells Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Atkinson Ells’ filings →

    More from the funding graph