· Public charity
Athlife Foundation Inc
Provide grants, educational resources, training, professional development, and other resources in secondary education to schools, school districts, educators and other staff, to support academic, career, leadership, mental health, wellness and holistic social development for student athletes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREEN STREET ACADEMY | $23,235 |
| BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT | $22,500 |
| ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT | $17,500 |
| DANBURY HIGH SCHOOL | $16,666 |
| POCONO MOUNTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT | $15,503 |
| WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $15,495 |
| MERIDEN PULIC SCHOOLS | $13,372 |
| SOUTHEATERN GREENE SCHOOL DISTRICT | $10,746 |
| FULTON COUNTY SCHOOLS | $10,000 |
| PHILLIPSBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT | $8,555 |
| ALIQUIPPA SCHOOL DISTRICT | $7,667 |
| FRIENDS OF JOHN JAY JAGUARS ATHLETI | $7,586 |
| FREDERICK DOUGLASS HS ATHLETICS | $6,666 |
| NOTH ATLANTA HS BOOSTER CLUB | $6,660 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MPMERIDEN PULIC SCHOOLS4× · 2022–2025 · $158k
- RPRICHMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS5× · 2017–2021 · $128k
- GSGREEN STREET ACADEMY INC4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- SWSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERSgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +235%
- LILEADERS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD CHARTER SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +26%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCOgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
Challenging and nurturing mind, body, and spirit, we inspire boys and girls to lead lives of purpose, faith, and integrity.
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
The mission of the passport academy charter school ("passport academy") is to prepare college and career ready graduates to thrive in a diverse community through an engaging blended learning experience that supports individual student…
A coeducational, college preparatory school serving students in grades 6-12 with a mission of "inspiring students to risk being their best".
Our mission is to cultivate collaborative learning communities in which every student has the right to an authentic education, plays a meaningful role in creating a positive social change, and becomes and active participant in working…
Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.
The new american academy charter school empowers learners and inspires leaders to make this a better world. through our collaborative teacher teams, mastery-based career ladder, and looping cycles, we offer personalized rigorous…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leaders in Our Neighborhood Charter School and the most unlike its peers is Friends of John Jay Athletics Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREEN STREET ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds 5A ELITE YOUTH EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
- Who funds HOMEWOOD CHIDREN'S VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds LEADERS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds Peralta Colleges Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF JOHN JAY ATHLETICS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Athlife Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.