Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Astellas Global Health Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$537k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

International$10MEducation$1.4MHealth$565kScience & Tech$450k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.8M
$345,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMREF HEALTH AFRICA$536,600
PATH$536,533
PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA$345,000
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$345,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY - AMPATH$28,492
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SIGHTSAVERS INC: $537k → 16%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $400k → 14%THE END FUND INC: $750k → 17%EVIDENCE ACTION INC: $400k → 14%AMERICARES FOUNDATION: $600k → 9%PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA: $345k → 14%CARE (COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE & RELIEF EVERYWHERE): $400k → 13%INDIANA UNIVERSITY - AMPATH: $537k → 16%PATH: $537k → 9%WORLD VISION: $450k → 14%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $345k → 14%END FUND INC: $400k → 17%USA FOR UNHCR: $345k → 14%AMERICARES: $345k → 9%PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA: $345k → 14%CARE (COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE & RELIEF EVERYWHERE): $300k → 13%INDIANA UNIVERSITY - AMPATH: $537k → 16%PATH: $537k → 9%WORLD VISION: $350k → 14%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $300k → 14%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $349k → 17%INDIANA UNIVERSITY - AMPATH: $450k → 16%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $349k → 17%INDIANA UNIVERSITY - AMPATH: $450k → 16%AMREF HEALTH AFRICA: $537k → 17%INDIANA UNIVERSITY - AMPATH: $28k → 16%AMREF HEALTH AFRICA: $537k → 17%AMREF HEALTH AFRICA: $537k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
CT
RI
CA
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 10 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against -62% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$11M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-62%

Still filing today

70%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    The End Fund Inc
    2× · 2019–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +39%
  • P
    PATH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +6%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    3× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SI
    SIGHTSAVERS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $537k · revenue -67%
  • IU
    Indiana University School of Medicine
    one grant, 2019 · $450k
  • EA
    EVIDENCE ACTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $400k · revenue +64%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
6
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
7
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
8
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
9
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
10
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
11
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
12
Project Orbis International Inc

Orbis builds strong and sustainable eye care systems globally that put treatment and prevention within reach

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is Americares Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF) — $1,609,800 · InternationalAMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF)The End Fund Inc — $1,150,000 · InternationalThe End Fund IncPATH — $1,073,067 · InternationalPATHINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $1,045,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPSAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $945,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $698,694 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $690,000 · InternationalPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INCEVIDENCE ACTION — $400,000 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR — $345,000 · InternationalINDIANA UNIVERSITY - AMPATH — $2,001,892 · OtherINDIANA UNIVERSITY - AMPATHWORLD VISION — $800,000 · OtherWORLD VISIONCARE (COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE & RELIEF EVERYWHERE) — $700,000 · OtherCARE (COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE & REL…Indiana University School of Medicine — $450,000 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineJAPANESE ORGANIZATION FOR INTERNATIONS COOPERATION IN FAMILY PLANNING — $350,000 · OtherJAPANESE ORGANIZATION FOR INTERNATIONS…SIGHTSAVERS INC — $536,700 · Health
International$7,956,561Other$4,301,892Health$536,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF) — $1,609,800 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetThe End Fund Inc — $1,150,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPATH — $1,073,067 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $1,045,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $945,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $698,694 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $690,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSIGHTSAVERS INC — $536,700 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION — $400,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $345,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF)
  • Who funds The End Fund Inc
  • Who funds PATH
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC
  • Who funds SIGHTSAVERS INC
  • Who funds EVIDENCE ACTION
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Astellas Global Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Astellas Global Health Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Astellas Global Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph