Skip to content

· Public charity

Association of Small Business Development Centers

To represent the collective interest of our members by promoting, informing, supporting and continuously improving the small business development centers network, which delivers nationwide educational assistance to strengthen small/medium business management, thereby contributing to the growth of local, state and national economies.

$539k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$263k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Community Improvement$22M
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $252k
  • $250k+1 grant · $263k
$54,700
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REINGOLD$263,214
GALVAN & ASSOCIATES INC$142,504
LEAD ONLINE ACADEMY INC$54,700
NICOLE ANTOINETTE CONSULTING LLC$54,656
BDO USA LLP$13,029
AWBC - ASSOCIATION OF WOMENS BUSINESS CENTERS$9,959
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $49k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
MO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 17 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$21M
$326k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+71%

Still filing today

47%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthEmploymentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AWBC - ASSOC OF WOMENS BUS CENTERS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $316k · revenue +261%
  • GT
    GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $53k · revenue +130%
  • WW
    WISCONSIN WOMEN'S BUSINESS INITIATIVE CORPORATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • P
    PRISM
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • GA
    GALVAN AND ASSOCIATES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $78k
  • CM
    COLUMBIA & MISSOURI UNIV ICESIgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $52k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Academy of International Business

We create, nurture, and empower a global community of scholars focused on creating, advancing, and disseminating knowledge in international business research, education, policy, and practice.

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
7
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
9
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
10
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
11
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
12
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvanians; the most unlike its peers is Lamar University Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MTX GROUP INC: $13,122,572 · OtherMTX GROUP INCREINGOLD: $3,673,427 · OtherREINGOLDGALVAN & ASSOCIATES INC: $922,315 · OtherLEAD ONLINE ACADEMY INC: $910,950 · OtherSQUIRE PATTON BOGGS LLP: $769,567 · OtherNICOLE ANTOINETTE CONSULTING LLC: $704,698 · Other+7 more: $654,544 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INNOVATION ASSOCIATION INC (INBIA): $375,872 · EducationCOLUMBIA & MISSOURI UNIV ICESI: $51,766 · EducationBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $50,227 · EducationFORMIPYMES & LAMAR UNIV: $42,983 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $40,808 · EducationAWBC - ASSOC OF WOMENS BUS CENTERS: $316,271 · EmploymentGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $52,500 · HealthVELOCITYTX LLC: $50,056 · HealthWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $48,813 · Human Services
Other$20,758,073Education$561,656Employment$316,271Health$102,556Human Services$48,813

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INNOVATION ASSOCIATION INC (INBIA): $375,872 over 3y, 10% of budgetAWBC - ASSOC OF WOMENS BUS CENTERS: $316,271 over 4y, 18% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $52,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA & MISSOURI UNIV ICESI: $51,766 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWISCONSIN WOMEN'S BUSINESS INITIATIVE CORPORATION: $50,227 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $50,227 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVELOCITYTX LLC: $50,056 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $48,813 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetFORMIPYMES & LAMAR UNIV: $42,983 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $40,808 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INNOVATION ASSOCIATION INC (INBIA) ↗
  • Who funds AWBC - ASSOC OF WOMENS BUS CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA & MISSOURI UNIV ICESI ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN WOMEN'S BUSINESS INITIATIVE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VELOCITYTX LLC ↗
  • Who funds WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS ↗
  • Who funds FORMIPYMES & LAMAR UNIV ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of Small Business Development Centers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of Small Business Development Centers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Association of Small Business Development Centers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph