· Public charity
Association for Computing Machinery Inc
We are an intl.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $650,540 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,986,722 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,336,182 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
- $250k+1 grant · $548k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION | $547,500 |
| IEEE | $55,540 |
| SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $15,000 |
| UC BERKELEY SIMONS INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $2.0M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, $229k to organizations and $1.8M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR SUMMER SCHOOL AT RECSYS 2024 · SUPPORT FOR THE SORAIM WINTER SCHOOL · SUPPORT FOR ACM SUMMER SCHOOL 2025 EVENT
Stated purpose: TRAVEL GRANTS TO ATTEND ACM CONFERENCE, AWARDS
Stated purpose: STUDENT TRAVEL GRANT TO ATTEND AINTEC 2024 CONFERENCE · STUDENT TRAVEL GRANT FOR INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF EDA · TRAVEL GRANTS TO ATTEND ACM CONFERENCE, AWARDS
Stated purpose: TRAVEL GRANTS FOR COMSNETS 2025 CONFERENCE · TRAVEL GRANTS TO ATTEND ACM CONFERENCE, AWARDS
Stated purpose: TRAVEL GRANTS TO ATTEND ACM CONFERENCE, AWARDS
Stated purpose: TRAVEL GRANTS TO ATTEND ACM CONFERENCE, AWARDS
Stated purpose: TRAVEL GRANTS TO ATTEND ACM CONFERENCE, AWARDS
Stated purpose: TRAVEL GRANTS TO ATTEND ACM CONFERENCE, AWARDS
Stated purpose: TRAVEL GRANTS TO ATTEND ACM CONFERENCE, AWARDS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION LLC6× · 2020–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +235%
- TCTHE COMPUTING RESEARCH ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2017–2020 · $381k · revenue +146%
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY2× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- PLPUTATIONALCOM LLCone grant, 2023 · $1.0M
- TMTHE MAXWELLHANRAHAN FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue +332%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anita Borg Institute for Technology and the most unlike its peers is The Maxwellhanrahan Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION LLC ↗
- Who funds THE MAXWELLHANRAHAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COMPUTING RESEARCH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds ANITA BORG INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES & SCHOOLS USA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLACK IN AI ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds Verified VotingOrg Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC ↗
- Who funds NY TECH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Association for the Advancement of Artificial Inte ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Carnegie Mellon University · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Association for Computing Machinery Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.