Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ask Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$220k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Human Services$1.2MArts & Culture$895kEducation$339kYouth Development$165kRecreation & Sports$44kInternational$41kCivil Rights$26kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $167k
$48,769
Median grant
2
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITY WATER$166,667
YOUNG VOICES OF AUSTIN$48,769
AUSTIN THEATER ALLIANCE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $804k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMMAS TORCH: $260 → 20%CHARITY WATER: $242k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $227k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $167k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $167k → 17%TEXAS CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $2k → 10%SOUNDWAVES ART FOUNDATION: $621 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 13 repeat orgs$304k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
59

Total granted

$2.5M
$304k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+61%

Still filing today

77%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHARITY GLOBAL INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +17%
  • WA
    WELL AWARE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +17%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $35k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NOBILITY PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • GA
    GREATER AUSTIN PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $42k
  • PL
    PARKER LANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Creative Alliance

The mission of Austin Creative Alliance is to advance, connect, and celebrate Austin's arts, culture, and creative communities in order to nourish and strengthen the character, quality of life, and economic prosperity of our region.

Arts & Culture
2
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
3
Arts Connect Houston

Arts Connect Houston unites with the greater Houston community to ensure access to high-quality arts education in creative writing, dance, music, theater, and the visual arts for every student, beginning with Houston ISD.

Arts & Culture
4
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
5
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
6
American Festival for the Arts

Founded in 1993, American Festival for the Arts (AFA) provides high quality community-based music education programs and performance opportunities designed primarily for youth and, through its concert series and outreach, seeks to broaden…

Arts & Culture
7
Austin Rainbow Theatre

Austin Rainbow Theatre provides affordable theatre that focuses on creating belonging, reducing stigma, honoring diverse LGBTQIA+ history and stories, and amplifying LGBTQIA+ artist and community voices.

Arts & Culture
8
The Austin School for the Performing & Visual Arts

The Austin School for the Performing and Visual Arts is a place for students who want to pursue artistic excellence while celebrating creativity community and service.

Education
9
The Awty International School

See Schedule OThe purpose of Awty International School (Awty) is to create an environment where students experience excellence every day to make their mark on the world alongside their community, in a spirit of curiosity, courage and…

—
10
Paramount Theatre for the Performing Arts Inc

We're here to inspire generations. we connect people and strengthen community by showcasing unforgettable performances across genres, providing life-changing arts education programs, and dreaming up magical experiences in iconic venues…

Arts & Culture
11
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
12
Capital of Texas Public Telecommunications Council

Klru is a leader in public media, distinguished by its energetic engagement with the community and for the quality and creativity of content. klru illuminates the wider world of knowledge; the importance of discourse; and the many…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Alliance for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
26/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $1,134,922 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC+3 more: $2,731 · Human ServicesYOUNG VOICES OF AUSTIN: $713,373 · Arts & CultureYOUNG VOICES OF AUSTINTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $35,132 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $31,302 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $27,030 · Arts & CultureThe Nobelity Project: $250,143 · EducationThe Nobelity …Todos Juntos Learning Center: $27,427 · EducationTodos Juntos …PRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213: $25,000 · EducationPRODEO ACADEM…+4 more: $23,735 · Education+4 moreTHE NOBILITY PROJECT: $70,000 · OtherTHE NOBILITY …Individual grant recipient: $62,000 · OtherIndividual gr…GREATER AUSTIN PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATION: $42,000 · OtherGREATER AUSTI…PARKER LANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherPARKER LANE U…THE HISPANIC ALLIANCE: $23,100 · OtherTHE HISPANIC …MUSIC FOR LIFEAFRICAN CHILDREN'S CHOIR: $15,075 · Other+42 more: $87,541 · Other+42 moreANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC: $163,378 · Youth Development+1 more: $350 · Youth DevelopmentWELL AWARE INC: $39,943 · InternationalPRATHAM USA: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFoundation for Philippine Medical Missions: $1,000 · PhilanthropyI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE: $709 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $341 · PhilanthropyPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $320 · Philanthropy
Human Services$1,137,653Arts & Culture$806,837Education$326,305Other$324,716Youth Development$163,728International$39,943Philanthropy$7,370

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $1,134,922 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG VOICES OF AUSTIN: $713,373 over 6y, 81% of budgetThe Nobelity Project: $250,143 over 3y, 13% of budgetANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC: $163,378 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetWELL AWARE INC: $39,943 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $35,132 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $31,302 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTodos Juntos Learning Center: $27,427 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetHISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $26,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetPRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BEVERLY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetActon Academy DC Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPTA TEXAS CONGRESS BARTON HILLS ELEMENTARY: $3,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetRODEO AUSTIN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRockley Family Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEXAS CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $1,850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCon Mi MADRE: $1,735 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $1,613 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HOSPITAL ART INC: $1,272 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN AREA ART FROM THE STREETS: $1,256 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFoundation for Philippine Medical Missions: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCreative Action: $910 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE: $709 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUNDWAVES ART FOUNDATION: $621 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOut Youth Inc: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $341 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $320 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMMA'S TORCH LTD: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER AUSTIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Greater Austin: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA MARIANELLA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG VOICES OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds The Nobelity Project ↗
  • Who funds ANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WELL AWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Todos Juntos Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213 ↗
  • Who funds THE BEVERLY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Acton Academy DC Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds PTA TEXAS CONGRESS BARTON HILLS ELEMENTARY ↗
  • Who funds RODEO AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds Rockley Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE TEXAS CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds Con Mi MADRE ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HOSPITAL ART INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN AREA ART FROM THE STREETS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX35.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Better Business Bureau · United Way for Greater Austin · Topfer Family Foundation · St David's Foundation · The Webber Family Foundation · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Tingari Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Greater Austin Performing Arts Center Inc · Tides Foundation · The Long Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ask Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ask Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ask Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ask Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ask’s filings →

    More from the funding graph