· Public charity
Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based Violence
Our mission is to disrupt gender-based violence, which causes physical, sexual, emotional, spiritual, and economic harm within AAPI communities throughout the U.S.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
- $50k–250k42 grants · $5.3M
- $250k+2 grants · $795k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GUAM COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL | $506,520 |
| MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLA | $288,568 |
| ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES | $236,754 |
| TOHGE CORPORATION | $164,028 |
| KILUSAN WELLNESS | $159,993 |
| FRACTURED ALTAS | $159,656 |
| CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS | $155,249 |
| ASIAN AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE | $152,826 |
| MEI FONG & ASSOCIATES DBA ASI | $152,114 |
| AAPCHO | $145,670 |
| API CHAYA | $145,146 |
| RAKSHA INC | $144,737 |
| SIKH FAMILY CENTER | $143,594 |
| GUMA MAMI INC | $143,467 |
| RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY INSTITU | $141,537 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $324k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGUAM COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT AND FAMILY VIOLENCE CORP2× · 2023–2024 · $627k · revenue +40% · 28% of their budget
- MAMONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY2× · 2023–2024 · $602k · revenue +7%
- AAARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES2× · 2023–2024 · $245k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- VIVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INCone grant, 2022 · $85k · revenue -85%
- ACACTIVATING CHANGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $63k · revenue +62%
- LJLA JOLLA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSone grant, 2018 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To organize Southeast Asian women, girls, Queer and Trans people to champion gender justice and collective liberation.
Our mission is to disrupt gender-based violence, which causes physical, sexual, emotional, spiritual, and economic harm within AAPI communities throughout the U.S. and its territories.
Coordinate pro bono legal aid for victims of anti-Asian violence.
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
Daya empowers survivors of domestic and sexual violence through services such as counseling, transitional housing, translation and interpretation, legal advocacy, and financial support, and educates the community to end the cycle of abuse.…
Represent interests of Asian-Pacific Island Women.
AAPI Women Lead is a community-based, intergenerational organization committed to ending violence and uplifting stories of Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (ANHPI) women, girls, and non-binary communities.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
ReWA is a non-profit, multi-ethnic organization that promotes inclusion, independence, personal leadership, and strong communities by providing refugee and immigrant women and their families with culturally and linguistically appropriate…
Provide referral help line, couseling, transitional home and supportto victims of domestic violence.
Advocacy group mandated to mental health and well being of Asian American, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monsoon Asians & Pacific Islanders in Solidarity and the most unlike its peers is AshaKiran Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GUAM COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT AND FAMILY VIOLENCE CORP ↗
- Who funds MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY ↗
- Who funds ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds SIKH FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASIANS AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
- Who funds KILUSAN WELLNESS INC ↗
- Who funds Research & Advocacy Institute Gilgit-Baltistan RAIGB ↗
- Who funds API CHAYA ↗
- Who funds Horizons Foundation ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific Islander Domestic Violence Resource Project ↗
- Who funds Communities As One ↗
- Who funds NOOR FAMILY SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EFFECTIVE PLANNING & INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION INC ↗
- Who funds Empowerment Works Inc ↗
- Who funds Guma' Mami Inc ↗
- Who funds Marshallese Educational Initiative ↗
- Who funds VICTIM ADVOCATES REACHING OUT ↗
- Who funds SEWA-AIFW ↗
- Who funds UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA ↗
- Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC COMMUNITY OF ALASKA ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds LAAL NYC ↗
- Who funds RAKSHA INC ↗
- Who funds MANFORWARD ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Karen Society of Buffalo Inc ↗
- Who funds Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMING GENERATIONS TG ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY REFUGEE & IMMIGRATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds AshaKiran Inc ↗
- Who funds AWAAZ ↗
- Who funds Asian Women United of Minnesota ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gofundmeorg · The Allstate Foundation · Women's Foundation of California · The San Francisco Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Novo Foundation · Tides Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.