Skip to content
Ashourian Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Ashourian Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$369k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$265k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$417kHuman Services$187kFood & Nutrition$113kPhilanthropy$42kCivil Rights$25kRecreation & Sports$15kInternational$12kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $250k+1 grant · $265k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST GERARD MATERNITY HOME & RESOURCE CENTER$265,000
Re-Threaded$41,885
Farm Share$15,000
Christ's Starfish Foundation$10,700
Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation$10,000
Compassion Interantional$9,460
Wildlife Rescue Coalition$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Exchange Club Family Center$2,500
TESORI FAMILY FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $212k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Christ's Starfish Foundation: $11k → 14%CHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%CHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%YOUTH CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 14%RETHREADED: $75k → 14%Re-Threaded: $42k → 14%RETHREADED: $30k → 14%RETHREADED: $15k → 14%RETHREADED: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$683k · 6 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$683k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+11%

Still filing today

67%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    Rethreaded Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $169k · revenue +20%
  • FARM SHARE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $113k · revenue +4%
  • CS
    CHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $41k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue +6%
  • FT
    FIGHT THE PUD CORP
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • M
    MDA
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Family Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Fischer Family Foundation Co Timeworks International Inc
—
4
The Womens Care Florida Foundation
—
5
Floridas Love in Action
Human Services
6
Todd & Jennifer Cusick Foundation
Philanthropy
7
The South Florida Charity Classic
Human Services
8
Celebrities Fore Kids Inc

The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…

Human Services
9
The Stefanski Family Foundation
—
10
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
11
Stifler Family Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The Jackson Chance Foundation

Our mission is to enrich the lives of families with babies in theneonatal intensive care unit (nicu) by allowing them to spend more timewith their critically ill baby. jcf created the nicu transportationprogram to partner with hospitals…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Tesori Family Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Jim and Tabitha Furyk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST GERARD MATERNITY HOME & RESOURCE CENTER: $305,326 · OtherST GERARD MATERNITY HOME & RESOURCE CENTERV FOR VICTORY: $40,000 · OtherV FOR VICTORYFIGHT THE PUD CORP: $25,000 · OtherFIGHT THE PUD CORPMDA: $25,000 · OtherMDARiver Garden Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Other+6 more: $25,071 · Other+6 moreRethreaded Inc: $169,385 · Human ServicesRethreaded IncCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $41,300 · Human ServicesCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesFARM SHARE INC: $113,000 · Food & NutritionFARM SHARE INCTHE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION: $36,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TESORI FAMILY FOUNDATION: $13,567 · Recreation & SportsSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL: $2,050 · EducationCompassion International Incorporated: $9,460 · InternationalDOWNTOWN VISION ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$435,397Human Services$211,685Food & Nutrition$113,000Philanthropy$41,000Recreation & Sports$13,567Education$12,050International$9,460Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRethreaded Inc: $169,385 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetFARM SHARE INC: $113,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $41,300 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetTHE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRiver Garden Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TESORI FAMILY FOUNDATION: $13,567 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL: $2,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN VISION ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYouth Crisis Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pga Tour IncThe Community Foundat…Enterprise Holdings F…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Pga Tour IncFL15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pga Tour Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ashourian Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashourian Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Farm Share Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Youth Crisis Center Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ashourian Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home