Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$468
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$5kReligion$4kHealth$2kScience & Tech$1kHuman Services$914Civil Rights$556Arts & Culture$450Housing & Shelter$360Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$468
SHALOMATHOMEORG$360
CHABAD OF SW BROWARD$180
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$105
BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE$100
Individual grant recipient$90
COVENANT HOUSE$90
AIM AT MELANOMA FOUNDATION$90
INTERNATIONAL MYLEMOA FOUNDATION$90
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $252) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOME SWEET HOME: $54 → 11%THE REFUTEE WOMAN'S NETWORK: $90 → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $108 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
SD
PA
CA
MO
VA
DE
KS
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12k · 20 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
35

Total granted

$12k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+15%

Still filing today

35%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $460 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionInternationalAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    3× · 2020–2023 · $636 · revenue +40%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $554 · revenue +74%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2021–2023 · $500 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • JK
    JCS KOSHER FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MORGA DAVID ADO
    one grant, 2023 · $360
  • A
    ADL
    one grant, 2023 · $360
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
5
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

—
6
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
7
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
8
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
12
All Faiths Food Bank Inc

Together with our partners, we provide healthy solutions to end hunger in our community.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blue Dove Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHALOMATHOME ORG INC: $1,530 · OtherSHALOMATHOME ORG INCIndividual grant recipient: $1,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $1,082 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHJCS KOSHER FOOD BANK: $1,035 · OtherJCS KOSHER FOOD BANKAMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $882 · OtherAMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETYCHABAD OF SW BROWARD: $738 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE OF FL: $680 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $507 · Other+37 more: $6,592 · Other+37 moreFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $1,115 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOU…Feeding America: $636 · Food & NutritionFeeding Ame…FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $75 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $554 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $90 · HealthAlices Kids Inc: $250 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $108 · Human ServicesREFUGEE WOMENS NETWORK INC: $90 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $90 · Human ServicesHOME SWEET HOME: $54 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $250 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $180 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $75 · InternationalHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $180 · AnimalsFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $180 · Community Improvement
Other$14,296Food & Nutrition$1,826Health$1,144Human Services$592International$505Animals$180Community Improvement$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $1,115 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $1,082 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $636 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $554 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlue Dove Foundation Inc: $322 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlices Kids Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE WOMENS NETWORK INC: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Blue Dove Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alices Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph