Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$468
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of ASHLEY LAUREN SCHILLINGER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$468
SHALOMATHOMEORG$360
CHABAD OF SW BROWARD$180
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$105
BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE$100
INTERNATIONAL MYLEMOA FOUNDATION$90
AIM AT MELANOMA FOUNDATION$90
Individual grant recipient$90
COVENANT HOUSE$90
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $252) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOME SWEET HOME: $54 → 11%THE REFUTEE WOMAN'S NETWORK: $90 → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $108 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
NY
SD
PA
CA
MO
VA
DE
KS
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12k · 20 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
35

Total granted

$12k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+15%

Still filing today

35%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $460 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionInternationalAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    3× · 2020–2023 · $636 · revenue +40%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $554 · revenue +74%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2021–2023 · $500 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • JK
    JCS KOSHER FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MORGA DAVID ADO
    one grant, 2023 · $360
  • A
    ADL
    one grant, 2023 · $360

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

5
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

6
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
7
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
8
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
12
All Faiths Food Bank Inc

Together with our partners, we provide healthy solutions to end hunger in our community.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blue Dove Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionJewish Community FederationsFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr9%29%35–55yr12%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%17%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr15%12%20–35yr9%41%35–55yr12%24%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 17% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,015

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHALOMATHOME ORG INC — $1,530 · OtherSHALOMATHOME ORG INCIndividual grant recipient — $1,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,082 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHJCS KOSHER FOOD BANK — $1,035 · OtherJCS KOSHER FOOD BANKAMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY — $882 · OtherAMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETYCHABAD OF SW BROWARD — $738 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE OF FL — $680 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $507 · Other+37 more — $6,592 · Other+37 moreFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $1,115 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOU…Feeding America — $636 · Food & NutritionFeeding Ame…FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC — $75 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $554 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $90 · HealthAlices Kids Inc — $250 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $108 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $90 · Human ServicesREFUGEE WOMENS NETWORK INC — $90 · Human ServicesHOME SWEET HOME — $54 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $250 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $180 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $75 · InternationalHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP — $180 · AnimalsFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $180 · Community Improvement
Other$14,296Food & Nutrition$1,826Health$1,144Human Services$592International$505Animals$180Community Improvement$180

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $1,115 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,082 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $636 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $554 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlue Dove Foundation Inc — $322 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlices Kids Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE WOMENS NETWORK INC — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME — $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Blue Dove Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Alices Kids Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc26% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc1% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ashley Lauren Schillinger Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph