Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ashley and Tony Munafo Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$196k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$154kCrime & Legal$100kFood & Nutrition$55kAnimals$38kHealth$26kEmployment$25kHuman Services$19kEnvironment$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ProKids$50,000
Moeller High School$50,000
Sam Hubbard Foundation$27,000
Old Friends$10,000
HCPA Charitable Foundation$10,000
The Dee Norton Lowcountry Children's Center$10,000
RMHC of Greater Cincinnati$5,000
Perch Farm Foundation$5,000
Coastal Conservation League$5,000
ORMCF$5,000
CISE$4,000
The Sean Loring Classic$2,500
Dorchester Paws$2,500
Cincinnati Animal CARE Humane Society$2,500
Ocean Reef Community Foundation$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND: $7k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$366k · 10 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$366k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+17%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthFood & NutritionCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    Old Friends Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $27k · revenue +41%
  • DN
    DEE NORTON LOWCOUNTRY CHILDREN'S CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +9%
  • OR
    OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +637%

Funded once

  • ES
    Easter Seals Tristate
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • TC
    The Christ Hospital Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +192%
  • TM
    THE MARY MAGDALEN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc

The Childrens Cancer Foundation, Inc. (Organization) is a charitable, not-for-profit corporation committed to funding locally-based researchers, programs and facilities until every child is assured a healthy cancer free future. The…

—
2
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
3
Cincinnati Parks Foundation

To build broad based private/public partnerships supporting the conservation and enhancement of our City's parks and greenspaces.

Recreation & Sports
4
Reef Renewal Usa Inc

Reef renewal usa is renewing coral reefs for future generations in a rapidly changing world by producing and outplanting resilient corals of the future at an unprecedented scale.

Environment
5
Ocean State Animal Coalition

The ocean state animal coalition (osac) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the status and well-being of animals in rhode island.

—
6
The Children's Center Foundation

None

Philanthropy
7
South Carolina Ovarian Cancer Foundation

The south carolina ovarian cancer foundation (scocf) was created as an organization to support women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, to be a source of education and awareness about the disease to people across the state, and to support…

Health
8
Pets Without Parents Columbus

To be a resource as a no-kill pet rescue service

Animals
9
Coalition of Care Greater Cincinnati

Coalition of Care of Greater Cincinnati exists to mobilize churches and to inspire volunteers to care for vulnerable children and fragile families.

Youth Development
10
Starfish Animal Rescue

To help abandoned dogs in kill shelters find permanent and responsible loving homes. We support and work with other reputable rescues who support our vision and standards.

Animals
11
South Carolina Aquarium

Our mission is to inspire conservation of the natural world by exhibiting and caring for animals, by excelling in education and research, and by providing an exceptional visitor experience.

Animals
12
Children's Cancer Family Foundation of Ne Wi Inc

Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ocean Reef Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Mary Magdalen Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Moeller High School: $150,000 · OtherMoeller High SchoolDEE NORTON LOWCOUNTRY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $14,000 · OtherDEE NORTON LOWCOUNTRY CHILDREN'S CENTERCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE: $11,500 · OtherHCPA Charitable Foundation: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $44,500 · Other+10 moreProKids: $100,000 · Civil RightsProKidsSam Hubbard Foundation: $47,000 · Youth DevelopmentSam Hubbard…Old Friends Inc: $26,500 · AnimalsOld Frien…CINCINNATI ANIMAL CARE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsCINCINNAT…Dorchester Paws: $5,000 · AnimalsDorcheste…ANGELS WATCH INC: $1,500 · AnimalsEaster Seals Tristate: $25,000 · EmploymentThe Christ Hospital Foundation: $10,000 · HealthSEAN LORING CLASSIC: $2,500 · HealthOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $2,500 · HealthPERCH FARM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$230,000Civil Rights$100,000Youth Development$47,000Animals$38,000Employment$25,000Health$15,000Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProKids: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSam Hubbard Foundation: $47,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetOld Friends Inc: $26,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEaster Seals Tristate: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEE NORTON LOWCOUNTRY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $14,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Christ Hospital Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARY MAGDALEN FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI ANIMAL CARE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERCH FARM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDorchester Paws: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCISE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS WATCH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Farmer Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Dan & Kris Neyer Family Foundation · Hcs Foundation · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ashley and Tony Munafo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashley and Tony Munafo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ashley and Tony Munafo Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph