Loading…
· Public charity
ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
See schedule o - page 36 for foundation mission statement.ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION generates and invests resources to improve the health of our community.vision ashland community health foundation (achf) leads philanthropic efforts to advance innovative and equitable approaches to community health and wellness.values…
$751k
Granted FY2024
14
Grants
1
Communities
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
—
2021
—
2022
expandtalent
2023
foodpurchaseexpandincreasemobile
2024
dentalcookingclasseshostuninsuredpurchaseclinic
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 14 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $216k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $321k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$110,000
- ASANTE ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$102,639
- PHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$57,864
- LA CLINICA$50,000
- ASHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT$44,521
- MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL$30,000
- TALENT MAKER CITY$30,000
- ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING$26,000
- ROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL$25,000
- DAVID'S CHAIR$20,000
- ASHLAND FAMILY YMCA$15,270
- ARMADILLO COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL$15,000
- ASHLAND WATER POLO TEAM$10,000
- PEACE HOUSE$6,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 10% of ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OR; read by stated purpose it is 89% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient addressRecipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 8 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +632% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
6
Total granted
$2.2M
$86k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+632%
+48%
Still filing today
50%
83%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMERCY FLIGHTS2× · 2022–2023 · $155k · revenue +96%
ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING3× · 2022–2024 · $69k · revenue +632%
TALENT MAKER CITY3× · 2022–2024 · $62k · revenue +1085%
Funded once
- AEASHLAND EMERGENCY FOOD BANKgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +260%
- JCJACKSON COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAULT AND RESPONSE TEAMone grant, 2023 · $18k
- URUNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGONone grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -77%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Rogue Food Unites
Rogue food unites uses food to heal individuals and communities during times of crisis.
Public Safety & Disaster
2
Umpqua Valley Farm to School
Umpqua Valley Farm to School strengthens local economies by partnering with regional farmers to provide healthy, locally sourced meals, icnreased food access, and ensuring that kids, farms, and communities thrive together. By supporting…
Human Services
3
Rogue Action Center
The Rogue Action Center builds organizing infrastructure, leaders, and community power for a just, inclusive, and sustainable Southern Oregon for everyone.
Community Improvement
4
Eastern Oregon Mission
Alleviate hunger and meet emergency needs
Human Services
5
Hunger Fighters Oregon
To address food insecurity in our community by offering accessible, high-quality, basic and supplemental food and essential hygiene items in a compassionate, low-barrier environment.
Food & Nutrition
6
Oregon Rural Action Inc
We are working to promote social justice, agricultural and economic sustainability, and stewardship of the region's land, air, and water.
Public Benefit
7
Resource Connections of Oregon
Assisting individuals with developmental disabilities to define, direct and pursue the life they choose through planning and coordination of services and resources.
Health
8
Rogue Climate
To empower Southern Oreogn communites most impacted by climate change.
Education
9
Thrive Umpqua
Thrive Umpqua is a community-led initiative that supports people working together to improve well-being.
Public Benefit
10
Orting Food Bank Inc
To collect and distribute food to those in need.
Food & Nutrition
11
Eugene-Springfield Solidarity Network
To provide assistance and awareness of oregon jobs
Civil Rights
12
Elevate Oregon
Elevating potential, building sustained relationships with urban youth, and charting paths to brighter futures.
Youth Development
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Adaptive Sports and the most unlike its peers is Medical Teams International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$2,026,271Education$188,000Health$155,000Youth Development$85,000Arts & Culture$61,500International$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MERCY FLIGHTS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING ↗
- Who funds TALENT MAKER CITY ↗
- Who funds ROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND EMERGENCY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds UNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGON ↗
- Who funds ARMADILLO COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds OREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PEACE HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Oregon Community FoundationOR28.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Carpenter Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Thalden Foundation · Anna May Family Foundation · The Haines Philanthropic Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · Gardner Grout Foundation · Sangham Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Careoregon Inc · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Rogue Valley Mentoring — 42% of income from government
- United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
- Mercy Flights Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: UNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGON.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 832855784 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on UNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGON, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 17% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Ashland Community Hospital Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Ashland Community Hospital Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines