Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ashai Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,300
Median grant
4
States reached
$922k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEADOWBROOK SCHOOL OF WESTON INCORPORATED$10,000
FAJR SCIENTIFIC$5,000
KARAM FOUNDATION NFP$5,000
VOTE SOLAR$5,000
BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC$5,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF BOSTON INC$3,300
PHILANTHROPY CONNECTION INC$2,500
ISLAMIC CENTER OF BOSTON INC$2,500
MIDDLE EAST CULTURAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY$1,000
NEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC$750
CENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY INC$750
MUSLIM WOMENS GIVING CIRCLE$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $5k → 7%NEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $750 → 8%VOTE SOLAR: $5k → 10%FAJR SCIENTIFIC: $5k → 16%KARAM FOUNDATION NFP: $5k → 14%MUSLIM WOMENS GIVING CIRCLE: $500 → 7%CENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY INC: $750 → 8%MIDDLE EAST CULTURAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $1k → 14%MEADOWBROOK SCHOOL OF WESTON INCORPORATED: $10k → 8%ISLAMIC CENTER OF BOSTON INC: $3k → 8%ISLAMIC CENTER OF BOSTON INC: $3k → 8%PHILANTHROPY CONNECTION INC: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
2
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
3
The Federation of Massachusetts Farmers and Gardeners Markets Inc

Mass farmers markets partners wtih farmers, consumers, and communities to improve the health of individuals, strenghten community vitality, and enhance local farm viability through farmers markets.

Food & Nutrition
4
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
5
Food Connect Co

At food connect, we're dedicated to bridging the gaps in our food system, working to end hunger and fostering healthier communities through our innovative initiatives and programs. we build scalable technologies that support last-mile…

Food & Nutrition
6
Givedirectly Inc

To reduce poverty by providing financial assistance directly to those in need.

Human Services
7
The Food Project Inc

The Food Project's mission is to create a thoughtful and productive community of youth and adults from diverse backgrounds who work together to build a sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
8
Mit Free Speech Alliance

To promote free expression, academic freedom, viewpoint diversity, and open scientific inquiry in the MIT community

Civil Rights
9
Jewish Vocational Service Inc

To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.

Employment
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Fair Count Inc

Fair count builds long-term power within historically undercounted communities. with the census as our north star, we use every iteration of civic participation as a catalyst to build a more equitable democracy.

Community Improvement
12
Middle East Investment Initiative Inc

Middle east investment initiative, inc. (meii) stimulates sustainable economic activity and long-lasting job creation in the middle east and north africa (mena) by designing and deploying finance and technical assistance programs to…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fajr Scientific; the most unlike its peers is Centre Street Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEADOWBROOK SCHOOL OF WESTON INCORPORATED: $10,000 · EducationMEADOWBROOK SCHOOL OF WESTON INCORPORATEDTHE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · EducationTHE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCKARAM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKARAM FOUNDATIONThe Philanthropy Connection Inc: $2,500 · PhilanthropyThe Philanthropy Con…ISLAMIC CENTER OF BOSTON INC: $5,800 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER OF…MUSLIM WOMENS GIVING CIRCLE: $500 · OtherMUSLIM WOMENS GIV…Vote Solar: $5,000 · EnvironmentVote SolarFAJR SCIENTIFIC: $5,000 · Science & TechFAJR SCIENTIF…CENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY INC: $750 · Food & NutritionNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $750 · Food & NutritionMIDDLE EAST CULTURAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · International
Education$15,000Philanthropy$7,500Other$6,300Environment$5,000Science & Tech$5,000Food & Nutrition$1,500International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEADOWBROOK SCHOOL OF WESTON INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ashai Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashai Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ashai’s filings →

    More from the funding graph