Skip to content

· Public charity

Ascension Texas

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

$280k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $165k
$24,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$110M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEADERSHIP AUSTIN$65,000
CENTRAL TEXAS QUALITY OF LIFE FOUNDATION$50,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF CENTRAL TEXAS$50,000
HAND TO HOLD$40,000
THE SAFE ALLIANCE$24,000
TRAVIS COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION$20,000
TEXAS STATE HISTORY MUSEUM FOUNDATION$10,000
WONDERS AND WORRIES$10,000
AUSTIN AREA HERITAGE COUNCIL$6,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HAND TO HOLD: $40k → 10%WONDERS AND WORRIES: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
2
Austin Together Fund

Austin together enables sustained collaborations that strengthen the nonprofit community to create better outcomes for central texans through our unique grant and community engagement model.

Community Improvement
3
Safe Streets Austin

Safe Streets Austin is a movement to transform Austins streets, bikeways, and trails into safe, vibrant, equitable places for people of all ages and abilities to walk, bike, roll, and gather.

Education
4
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
5
Austin Convention & Visitors Bureau

The austin convention and visitors bureau promotes tourism in the austin area to enhance the economy of the community.

—
6
Texas Water Foundation

Texas water foundation is a statewide nonprofit that provides educational resources and educational services on water in texas for decision makers, water professionals, and everyday texans. texas water foundation works in the areas of…

Environment
7
Texas Land Trust Council

To support texas land trusts and promote land conservation efforts in texas. host texas land conservation conference to educate conservation related professionals and volunteers from across the state.

Environment
8
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
9
Texans Care for Children Inc

Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…

Crime & Legal
10
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
11
Austin Area Urban League

Social Services to low income persons.

Human Services
12
TogetherAustin

To connect Central Texans to resources by reducing barriers expanding access and filling gaps in service.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Austin; the most unlike its peers is Austin Area Heritage Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
1/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $50,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE P…THE SAFE ALLIANCE: $24,000 · OtherTHE SAFE ALLIANCELEADERSHIP AUSTIN: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentLEADERSHIP AUSTINCENTRAL TEXAS QUALITY OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationCENTRAL TEXAS QUALIT…HAND TO HOLD: $40,000 · Human ServicesHAND TO HOLDWonders & Worries Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesWonders & Worries In…Travis County Parks Foundation: $20,000 · Public BenefitTEXAS STATE HISTORY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN AREA HERITAGE COUNCIL: $6,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$74,000Youth Development$65,000Education$50,000Human Services$50,000Public Benefit$20,000Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEADERSHIP AUSTIN: $65,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAND TO HOLD: $40,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $24,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTravis County Parks Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetWonders & Worries Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN AREA HERITAGE COUNCIL: $6,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ascension SetonMO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ascension Seton · St David's Foundation · Better Business Bureau · Austin Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ascension Texas funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ascension Texas. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ascension Texas?

    Find your warmest path to Ascension Texas through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ascension Texas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph