Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arturo & Eunjae Peralta-Ramos Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Health$228kEnvironment$171kReligion$150kYouth Development$144kEducation$84kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kRecreation & Sports$33kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $69k
$28,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OXYGEN PROJECT INC$31,000
CAPTAIN PLANET FOUNDATION$28,000
UNIVERSITY OF TN FOUNDATION$10,000
GOOD SAMARITAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE EARTHFIRE INSTITUTE: $15k → 7%CHILDREN AND NATURE NETWORK: $1k → 11%AMERICAN CANAL SOCIETY: $8k → 11%MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION: $40k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $50k → 14%PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TN FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%GOOD SAMARITAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $6k → 9%CHRIST COVENANT: $140k → 13%THE KOREAN AMERICAN CULTRUAL FDN: $5k → 14%LAGRANGE COLLEGE: $30k → 18%GSPC: $10k → 14%BELIEVE IN BELIZE: $10k → 8%MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION: $35k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $30k → 14%FARRAGUT HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 12%GOOD SAMARITAN PRESBYTERIAN: $20k → 9%SHEPHERD CENTER: $27k → 13%WINSHAPE CANCER CENTER: $500 → 14%LAGRANGE COLLEGE: $20k → 18%MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION: $30k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $30k → 14%FARRAGUT HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 12%SHEPHERD CENTER: $25k → 13%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $1k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $20k → 14%ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN: $23k → 13%SHEPARD CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%GA PROFESSIONAL STANDARD COMMISSION: $10k → 13%ATLANTA HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 13%CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER KEEPER: $1k → 13%ALPHA CHI OMEGA: $20k → 13%GEORGIA TECH WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL TEA: $20k → 13%GT VOLLEYBALL: $13k → 13%AT FUND: $2k → 13%BADGE TO FAMILY OUTREACH FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%CAPTAIN PLANET FOUNDATION: $88k → 13%CAPTAIN PLANET FOUNDATION: $36k → 13%OXYGEN PROJECT INC: $31k → 13%CAPTAIN PLANET FOUNDATION: $28k → 13%ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%CAPTAIN PLANET FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%CAPTAIN PLANET FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
NY
PA
NJ
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$553k · 6 repeat orgs$442k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
25

Total granted

$553k
$395k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+47%

Still filing today

83%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’25
EnvironmentHealthEducationInternationalPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    4× · 2018–2023 · $135k · revenue +479%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $130k · revenue +43%
  • SC
    SHEPHERD CENTER INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $52k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRIST COVENANT
    one grant, 2018 · $140k
  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +74%
  • TA
    THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue +194%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech
4
African Parks Foundation of America

To engage the united states and its citizens in the work of african parks and to promote access to american experience and expertise in the african parks actiities by 1) raising funds for specific projects, activities, training, equipment…

Recreation & Sports
5
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
6
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
7
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
9
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Police Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Oxygen Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Captain Planet Foundation Inc: $172,000 · OtherCaptain Planet Foundation IncCHRIST COVENANT: $140,000 · OtherCHRIST COVENANTALPHA CHI OMEGA: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherGEORGIA TECH WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL TEA: $20,000 · Other+13 more: $103,100 · Other+13 moreTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $135,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDA…SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $51,500 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTER INCPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION I…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $130,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND IN…OXYGEN PROJECT INC: $31,000 · EnvironmentOXYGEN PROJECT INCTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $22,500 · EnvironmentTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL …THE EARTHFIRE INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE EARTHFIRE INSTITUT…+2 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentLaGrange College: $50,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalBelieve in Belize: $10,000 · InternationalSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$475,100Health$217,500Environment$200,500Education$61,000Crime & Legal$20,000International$10,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCaptain Planet Foundation Inc: $172,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $51,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLaGrange College: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE EARTHFIRE INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBelieve in Belize: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBUCKHEAD PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBack the Blue Atlanta Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN & NATURE NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arturo & Eunjae Peralta-Ramos Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arturo & Eunjae Peralta-Ramos Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arturo & Eunjae Peralta-Ramos’ filings →

    More from the funding graph