· Private foundation
A R Tony and Maria J Sanchez Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of A R TONY AND MARIA J SANCHEZ FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $129k
- $50k–250k26 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY | $800,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON | $600,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON | $302,000 |
| ANGELA HOUSE | $300,000 |
| BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $200,000 |
| BRIGHTER BITES | $150,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF HOUSTON | $145,000 |
| HOUSTON FOOD BANK | $130,000 |
| SOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK | $130,000 |
| AWTY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL | $125,000 |
| SAN JOS CLINIC | $125,000 |
| NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES | $100,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS | $100,000 |
| ST JOHN'S SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| THE WOMEN'S HOME | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBaylor College of Medicine7× · 2018–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +49%
- SMSt Mary's University6× · 2017–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +32%
- CSChristus Spohn Health System Corporation4× · 2017–2020 · $1.0M · revenue +18%
Funded once
- MCMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIESone grant, 2017 · $475k
- SFSan Francisco Nativity Academygraduatedone grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +33%
- SHSACRED HEART CHILDREN'S SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $163k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).
To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
To implement solutions that promote good health for the individual, the health system and the community. we collaborate with others as well as create signature, evidence-based ways to improve the communities where people live, work, learn…
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Association for the Advancement of Mexican Americans and the most unlike its peers is The Sorola Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds St Mary's University ↗
- Who funds Christus Spohn Health System Corporation ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds The Awty International School ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Houstons House of Hope ↗
- Who funds St John's School ↗
- Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
- Who funds University of the Incarnate Word ↗
- Who funds Bethany House of Laredo Inc ↗
- Who funds MERCY MINISTRIES OF LAREDO ↗
- Who funds Brighter Bites Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA DE MISERICORDIA ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Nativity Academy ↗
- Who funds My Connect Community ↗
- Who funds CASA JUAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds CYPRESS COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds AVDA ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Small Steps Nurturing Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Marek Family Foundation · Charity Guild of Catholic Women of Harris County Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Scanlan Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Laredo Area Community Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Houston Food Bank
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization A R Tony and Maria J Sanchez Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to A R Tony and Maria J Sanchez Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to A R Tony and Maria J Sanchez Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.