Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate.

$736k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$383k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $115,601 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $735,860 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $620,259 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $101k
$20,118
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH MUSEUM NEW YORK$40,533
THE ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC$40,000
INTERNATIONAL STUDIO AND CURATORIAL PROGRAM (ISCP)$20,118
18TH STREET ARTS CENTER$7,750
RESIDENCY UNLIMITED (RU)$7,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE ANDY WARHOL MUSEUM (CARNEGIE INSTITUTE): $7k → 11%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%CENTER FOR EXPLORATORY AND PERCEPTUAL ARTS: $8k → 13%PERFORMA INC: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL STUDIO AND CURATORIAL PROGRAM (ISCP): $25k → 20%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION: $8k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE BASS MUSEUM INC: $7k → 15%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT: $10k → 21%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $5k → 14%CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS AND SPECIAL EVENTS: $6k → 14%THE ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $40k → 14%JOSE LIMON FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 17%INTERNATIONAL STUDIO AND CURATORIAL PROGRAM (ISCP): $24k → 20%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%THE ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $8k → 14%JEWISH MUSEUM NEW YORK: $41k → 17%INTERNATIONAL STUDIO AND CURATORIAL PROGRAM (ISCP): $20k → 20%18TH STREET ARTS CENTER: $8k → 14%JEWISH MUSEUM: $11k → 17%INTERNATIONAL STUDIO AND CURATORIAL PROGRAM (ISCP): $15k → 20%MUSEUM ASSOCIATES DBA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART: $19k → 14%THE NEW MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL STUDIO AND CURATORIAL PROGRAM (ISCP): $13k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $5k → 17%RESIDENCY UNLIMITED (RU): $7k → 20%BROOKLYN ARTS COUNCIL INC: $5k → 20%ELM FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
RI
CA
DC
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $540k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $445k to organizations and $94k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$277k · 51% · 4 grants · 16 people

Stated purpose: FOR CONTEMPORARY ART

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$262k · 49% · 11 grants · 3 people

Stated purpose: FOR CONTEMPORARY ART

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$197k · 3 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
17

Total granted

$197k
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+25%

Still filing today

100%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $98k · revenue +31%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUM
    2× · 2018–2024 · $52k · revenue +43%
  • AH
    ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • PM
    PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2022 · $44k · revenue +8%
  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $19k · revenue +89%
  • MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
2
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
3
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
6
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
7
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
8
The Performance Art Museum

The performance art museum (pam) is the first u.s. institution exclusively dedicated to the presentation and preservation of live art. our mission is to facilitate the powerful impact of live experiences that can profoundly transform our…

Arts & Culture
9
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
10
Berggruen Institute
Education
11
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
12
Art Explorium

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Museum of Contemporary Art and the most unlike its peers is American University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr19%15%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%16%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr19%35%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,738

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INC — $97,500 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INCTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $51,533 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUMARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $47,500 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INCPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $43,600 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ARTMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $19,000 · Arts & Culture+13 more — $97,950 · Arts & Culture+13 moreAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationCITY OF CHICAGO — $6,000 · Other
Arts & Culture$357,083Education$20,000Other$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INC — $97,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $51,533 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $47,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $43,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPERFORMA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget18TH STREET ARTS COMPLEX — $7,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Exploratory and Perceptual Arts Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRESIDENCY UNLIMITED INC — $7,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BASS MUSEUM INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetELM FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN ARTS COUNCIL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc?

    Find your warmest path to Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph