How much does Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation give?

Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $209 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 21 and 35 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (68%), Religion (14%), Health (3%).

Who are Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Hope the Mission ($8k), St Baldrick's Foundation Inc ($4k), Center Theatre Group of Los Angeles ($4k).

Does Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 19% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.

Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation

Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation

Q: Where is Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation based?

Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation is based in CA.

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$209

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$209

Largest

01What it funds

0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$183kReligion$38kHealth$9kHousing & Shelter$8kInternational$6kArts & Culture$4kAnimals$3kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0

02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$209

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
TEMPLE JUDEA	$209

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$90k · 40 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$90k

$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%

-4%

Still filing today

35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

ReligionInternationalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HT
HOPE THE MISSION
5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue ×16
SA
SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC
4× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +146%
SI
Sharsheret Inc
4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +123%

Funded once

AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -51%
GE
Gush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman
one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -48%
PR
Parkinson's Resource Organization Inc
one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -60%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech

The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture

American Zionist Movement Inc

Working across a broad ideolgical, political, and religious spectrum linking the american jewish community together in support of israel, zionism and the jewish people

Religion

Sherit Isroel

—

Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy

Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International

American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights

Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation

Philanthropy

Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy

Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shalom Institute Camp & Conference Center; the most unlike its peers is Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/32

Grantees still filing

18/32

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$243,195Human Services$8,425Arts & Culture$4,600Philanthropy$4,477International$3,970Religion$2,678Health$2,536

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Arthur W & Madeline R Jablon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home