Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

California · Nonprofit

PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP

PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $109,984 to it, the largest being BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ($57,500). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$139k
Revenue FY2017
7
Funders on record
$110k
Grants received
$28k
Net assets
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2020: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income rose $14k → $15k.

3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 87%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

79% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP.

52%
largest funder
87%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 87% · 2018 56% · 2019 37% · 2020 99%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP draws 96% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 3 states in all.

NY
CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $29k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

75%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP?
PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $109,984 to it, the largest being BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ($57,500). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $109,984 in grants to PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP?
BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC is the largest funder on record, with $57,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJECT CHICKEN SOUP find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2017 (financials across 2017–2017), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing