Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arthur D and Dianna L Hurtado Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$234kEducation$133kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$723k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE$25,000
UNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INC$8,000
ALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA ARGENTINA$5,900
ASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINAR$5,000
COOPERATIVE BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP INC$5,000
CONFEDERACION EVANGELICA BAUTISTA (SITB)$5,000
CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE$3,560
CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE$2,880
ALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA ARGENTINA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 59% of grant dollars ($222k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 41% that went abroad ($151k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $25k → 9%GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5k → 14%CALVARY DE TAOS INCORPORATED: $3k → 18%UNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INC: $8k → 14%ASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINAR: $8k → 10%COOPERATIVE BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP INC: $5k → 14%CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE: $4k → 15%LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $15k → 9%GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5k → 14%LOGOS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $10k → 14%ASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINAR: $5k → 10%CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE: $3k → 15%LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $10k → 9%SOUTH AMERICAN TEACHING & SERVICE INC (SATS): $13k → 14%LOGOS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $10k → 14%ASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINAR: $5k → 10%LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $10k → 9%SOUTH AMERICAN TEACHING & SERVICE INC (SATS): $8k → 14%LOGOS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $9k → 14%ASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINAR: $3k → 10%LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $10k → 9%SOUTH AMERICAN TEACHING & SERVICE INC: $5k → 14%LOGOS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $5k → 14%ASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINAR: $3k → 10%SOUTH AMERICAN TEACHING & SERVICE INC (SATS): $4k → 14%UNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INC: $5k → 14%ASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINAR: $1k → 10%SOUTH AMERICAN TEACHING & SERVICE INC (SATS): $3k → 14%UNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INC: $3k → 14%MASTERS ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL INC: $3k → 14%UNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 41% of all-years giving ($151k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Argentina$118k · 20 grants
Uruguay$33k · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$322k · 10 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$322k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-3%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LB
    LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +33%
  • LP
    Luis Palau Association
    2× · 2017–2022 · $40k · revenue +54%
  • SA
    South American Teaching & Service Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $33k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA DEL URUGUAY
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • IB
    Institute Biblica Buenos Aires
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA ARGENTINA: $39,500 · OtherALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA ARGENTINALOGOS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $34,140 · OtherLOGOS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INCCONFEDERACION EVANGELICA BAUTISTA (SITB): $32,475 · OtherCONFEDERACION EVANGELICA BAUTISTA (SITB)ASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINAR: $24,465 · OtherASOCIACION CIVIL DE EDUCACION CRISTIANA DE URDINARALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA DEL URUGUAY (CETAU): $20,440 · OtherALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA DEL URUGUAY (CETAU)UNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INC: $18,500 · OtherUNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INCALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA DEL URUGUAY: $12,610 · OtherALIANZA CRISTIANA Y MISIONERA DEL URUGUAYIndividual grant recipient: $11,126 · OtherInstitute Biblica Buenos Aires (IBBA): $10,361 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $13,940 · Other+3 moreLANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $70,000 · EducationLANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGESouth American Teaching & Service Inc: $32,600 · EducationSouth American Teaching & Servi…Luis Palau Association: $40,000 · ReligionLuis Palau A…The Master's Academy International Inc: $2,500 · ReligionThe Master's…
Other$227,557Education$102,600Religion$42,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSouth American Teaching & Service Inc: $32,600 over 5y, 15% of budgetUNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INC: $18,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetThe Master's Academy International Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
  • Who funds South American Teaching & Service Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSIDAD CRISTIANA LOGOS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Master's Academy International Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arthur D and Dianna L Hurtado Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arthur D and Dianna L Hurtado Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arthur D and Dianna L Hurtado’s filings →

    More from the funding graph