Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arnold Rogers & Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$810kCrime & Legal$180kHuman Services$151kYouth Development$126kHousing & Shelter$73kReligion$52kHealth$18kInternational$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARDING UNIVERSITY$60,000
CENTRAL ARKANSAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$56,800
THE ONE INC (THE VAN)$25,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SALINE COUNTY$20,000
ARKANSAS PRISON MINISTRY BROTHERHOOD$15,000
CHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER$10,000
ECONOMICS ARKANSAS FOUNDATION$7,500
OZARK MISSION PROJECT$5,000
FRIENDLY CHAPEL CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE$5,000
RIVER CITY MINISTRY OF PULASKI COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDREN'S HOMES INC: $4k → 16%RIVER CITY MINISTRY OF PULASKI COUNTY: $50k → 17%RIVER CITY MINISTRY OF PULASKI COUNTY: $25k → 17%HANDUP HOUSING OF ARKANSAS: $20k → 17%HANDUP HOUSING OF ARKANSAS: $15k → 17%HANDUP HOUSING OF ARKANSAS: $10k → 17%HANDUP HOUSING OF ARKANSAS: $10k → 17%RIVER CITY MINISTRY OF PULASKI COUNTY: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$1.4M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+184%

Still filing today

63%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionCrime & LegalHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CENTRAL ARKANSAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $377k · revenue +82%
  • HU
    HAND UP HOUSING OF ARKANSAS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $55k · revenue +72% · 31% of their budget
  • CP
    CHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • EH
    ELIM HOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • RA
    ROBERT ACRE FBO MARILYN ROBERTS
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • CH
    CHILDRENS HOME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Arkansas Development Council

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement
2
Ark City Christian Academy Inc

Educational institution for primary and secondary age students in a non- public christian curriculum and environment

Education
3
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
4
East Arkansas Youth Services Inc

The mission of east arkansas youth services, inc. is to provide a comprehensive continuum of care to include therapeutic, educational, and advocacy services, to youth and their families, and to instill motivation and courage to empower…

Human Services
5
Arkansas Employment Career Center

Arkansas employment career centers' mission is to assist individuals with career opportunities through education and training. the primary target groups are individuals returning home from incarceration, veterans, homeless, and young…

Human Services
6
Northwest Arkansas Children's Shelter in Dba Everhope Arkansas Inc

To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.

Human Services
7
Christian Recovery Centers Inc

To provide guidance and rehabilitation in a christ centered residential setting for persons with addiction

Health
8
UrbanPromise Arkansas Inc

To equip students with the skills necessary for academic achievement, spiritual growth, and life management as servant leaders.

Youth Development
9
United Methodist Children's Home

To provide quality compassionate behavioral healthcare services to children and families of arkansas through a comprehensive continuum of programs which include residential treatment center care, therapeutic group home care, emergency…

Human Services
10
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
11
Trinity Village Inc

The mission of trinity village is to provide a christian home at an affordable cost to retired, disabled and elderly residents of southeast arkansas. we are committed to provide continuing quality healthcare in a secure environment where…

Human Services
12
Arkansas Construction Education Foundation

Provide educational programs for construction industries.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Arkansas Christian Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hand Up Housing of Arkansas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Harding University Inc — $376,400 · OtherHarding University IncARKANSAS PRISON MINISTRY BROTHERHOOD INC — $138,000 · OtherARKANSAS PRISON MINISTRY BROTHERHOOD INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SALINE COUNTY — $80,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SALINE COUNTYTHE ONE INC (THE VAN) — $25,500 · OtherSINGLE PARENT SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $25,000 · Other+9 more — $62,740 · Other+9 moreCENTRAL ARKANSAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $377,267 · EducationCENTRAL ARKANSAS CHRISTIAN SCHOO…ECONOMICS ARKANSAS FOUNDATION — $31,500 · EducationECONOMICS ARKANSAS FOUNDATIONRIVER CITY MINISTRY OF PULASKI COUNTY — $135,000 · Human ServicesRIVER CITY MINI…HAND UP HOUSING OF ARKANSAS — $55,000 · Human ServicesHAND UP HOUSING…+1 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesMISSION FOUR18 INC — $45,000 · Religion+1 more — $1,000 · ReligionCHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER — $40,000 · Crime & LegalPATHWAY TO FREEDOM INC — $2,000 · Crime & LegalOZARK MISSION PROJECT INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterJOHN 316 MINISTRIES INC — $4,500 · Health
Other$707,640Education$408,767Human Services$194,000Religion$46,000Crime & Legal$42,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Health$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRAL ARKANSAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $377,267 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetHarding University Inc — $376,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER CITY MINISTRY OF PULASKI COUNTY — $135,000 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SALINE COUNTY — $80,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHAND UP HOUSING OF ARKANSAS — $55,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetMISSION FOUR18 INC — $45,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER — $40,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetECONOMICS ARKANSAS FOUNDATION — $31,500 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetOZARK MISSION PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJOHN 316 MINISTRIES INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAY TO FREEDOM INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL ARKANSAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds Harding University Inc
  • Who funds RIVER CITY MINISTRY OF PULASKI COUNTY
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SALINE COUNTY
  • Who funds HAND UP HOUSING OF ARKANSAS
  • Who funds MISSION FOUR18 INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S PROTECTION CENTER
  • Who funds ECONOMICS ARKANSAS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OZARK MISSION PROJECT INC
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds CHILDRENS HOME INC
  • Who funds PATHWAY TO FREEDOM INC
  • Who funds CITY CONNECTIONS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arnold Rogers & Smith Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph