Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arnold Horwitch Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2021
27
Grants FY2021
10
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Arnold Horwitch Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Foundation Of Greater Phoenix, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Arnold Horwitch Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 21 organizations, $105k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
17
4
18
5
19
12
20
21
21
1
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Philanthropy$742kHealth$38kReligion$32kArts & Culture$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kInternational$13kEducation$11kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2021 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k21 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION OR TZION$15,000
KHAN ACADEMY$10,000
RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHOENIX$10,000
HIAS$10,000
PROVIDENCE STVINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION$9,500
MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$5,000
ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST$4,500
PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$2,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,500
ADAPTIVE ADVENTURES - BOULDER$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHE'S THE FIRST: $530 → 17%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIUON OF BOULDER: $1k → 12%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $50 → 11%ATTENTION HOMES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
OR
IA
CT
CA
CO
AZ
NM
AR
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$137k · 12 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$137k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+50%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $530 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +20%
  • GD
    GESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +111%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • TM
    TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +50%
  • PS
    PRIVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
3
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
4
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
5
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
8
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

11
Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce

Greater phoenix chamber of commerce (the chamber) catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent.

12
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley and the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Food Pantries & AssistanceChild and Family ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Public Library SupportGovernment Accountability R…Classical Music EnsemblesHospice Care ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr15%18%20–35yr10%30%35–55yr12%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr15%90%20–35yr10%1%35–55yr12%6%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
16%
4,465/28,449

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
28/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER PHOENIX — $681,891 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER PHOENIXJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHOENIX — $30,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION …GREATER PHOENIX JEWISH FEDERATION — $30,000 · OtherGREATER PHOENIX JE…CONGREGATION OR TZION — $28,750 · OtherCONGREGATION OR TZ…Individual grant recipient — $20,855 · OtherIndividual grant r…GESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC — $5,500 · Other+28 more — $34,920 · Other+28 moreRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC — $10,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $9,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC — $4,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 · HealthAdaptive Adventures — $1,250 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthHIAS INC — $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $2,000 · InternationalTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX ART MUSEUM — $750 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST — $6,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 · Human ServicesATTENTION INC — $1,250 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $1,250 · Human ServicesSHE'S THE FIRST INC — $530 · Human Services+1 more — $50 · Human ServicesKHAN ACADEMY INC — $10,000 · EducationSEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $500 · Education
Philanthropy$681,891Other$150,025Health$26,750International$22,000Arts & Culture$16,750Human Services$11,580Education$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER PHOENIX — $681,891 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST — $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC — $5,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWest Seattle Food Bank — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Humane Society — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN GLEANERS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATTENTION INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdaptive Adventures — $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHE'S THE FIRST INC — $530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER LIFELINE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Friedel Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arnold Horwitch Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arnold Horwitch Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Arnold Horwitch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph