Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Armond & Rose Caplan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$207kFood & Nutrition$190kHuman Services$162kPhilanthropy$70kEducation$66kHealth$54kInternational$34kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH FED OF TIDEWATER$55,000
CONGREGATION BETH EL$37,206
UNITED WAY OF SHR$10,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$10,000
BENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION$10,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
JEWISH MUSEUM & CULTURAL CTR$5,000
HEBREW ACADEMY OF TIDEWATER$5,000
ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF TIDEWATER$5,000
CAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE$5,000
MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
JAFCO$1,800
CAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 7%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 7%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 7%ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%HOSPICE HOUSE OF HAMPTON ROADS: $2k → 10%ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $9k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF TIDEWATER: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF TIDEWATER: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF TIDEWATER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MI
NY
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 30% of Armond & Rose Caplan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 66% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Armond & Rose Caplan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$797k · 36 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
20

Total granted

$797k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+74%

Still filing today

56%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +183%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    3× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue +110%
  • FO
    FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA
    4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • FC
    FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • HH
    HOSPICE HOUSE OF HAMPTON ROADS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +163%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abraham Joshua Heschel School

The abraham joshua heschel school is an independent jewish day school which includes students from a wide range of jewish backgrounds, practices and beliefs. (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
4
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
5
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
6
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
9
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
10
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

12
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center of Richmond and the most unlike its peers is The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsCancer Support OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Hospice Care ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr14%17%20–35yr15%31%35–55yr15%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr14%4%20–35yr15%33%35–55yr15%55%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,438

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH EL — $203,618 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ELUNITED JEWISH FED OF TIDEWATER — $160,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH FED OF TIDEWATERIndividual grant recipient — $71,016 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED WAY OF SHR — $70,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF SHRHEBREW ACADEMY OF TIDEWATER STRELITZ INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY — $26,050 · OtherEVMS FOUNDATION — $22,500 · Other+38 more — $54,547 · Other+38 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND — $50,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMU…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF TIDEWATER INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMIL…Jewish Family Services Inc — $14,000 · Human ServicesJewish Famil…ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION — $6,500 · Human ServicesELIZA HOPE F…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $5,400 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FOU…+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $32,000 · International+1 more — $1,050 · InternationalFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA — $30,000 · Food & NutritionCAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC — $26,450 · Education+2 more — $518 · EducationBENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION — $11,500 · Youth DevelopmentMELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY — $10,775 · Religion+1 more — $272 · Religion
Other$607,731Human Services$92,900International$33,050Food & Nutrition$30,000Education$26,968Youth Development$11,500Religion$11,047

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC — $26,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF TIDEWATER STRELITZ INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY — $26,050 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF TIDEWATER INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Family Services Inc — $14,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION — $11,500 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetMELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY — $10,775 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $5,880 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $5,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE HOUSE OF HAMPTON ROADS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Nicole Schiffman Foundation — $400 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics Virginia Inc — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $272 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST LEARNING AND EDUCATION FUND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY — $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $48 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA
  • Who funds CAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds HEBREW ACADEMY OF TIDEWATER STRELITZ INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF TIDEWATER INC
  • Who funds Jewish Family Services Inc
  • Who funds BENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds ELIZA HOPE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE HOUSE OF HAMPTON ROADS INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds CAROLINA WATERFOWL RESCUE INC
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Celia Kleinfeld Krichman Charitable Tr TrustVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Celia Kleinfeld Krichman Charitable Tr Trust · Alan & Esther Fleder Foundation · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · Hampton Roads Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Armond & Rose Caplan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Melvin J Berman Hebrew Academy2% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Armond & Rose Caplan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Armond & Rose Caplan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph