Skip to content
Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$5.4MHousing & Shelter$2.2MHuman Services$1.5MYouth Development$607kPhilanthropy$570kArts & Culture$100kCivil Rights$95kAnimals$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k42 grants · $450k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $281k
  • $250k+2 grants · $660k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALOHA HOUSE$350,000
PEER TRIBE FOUNDATION$310,000
MENDOCINO COAST HOSPITALITY CENTER$106,000
Individual grant recipient$65,000
TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER$60,000
OUTSIDE THE FRAME$50,000
TRUE COLORS UNITED$20,000
INDIGENOUS WELLNESS ALLIANCE INC$20,000
CARON FOUNDATION$20,000
SAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION$10,000
OPERATION HOPE-NORTH COUNTY$10,000
OUR TIME TO ACT UNITED$10,000
PACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION$10,000
LIVE VIOLENCE FREE$10,000
THE QUEER SOL COLLECTIVE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $200k → 10%THE SIDEWALK PROJECT: $10k → 14%NEW NARRATIVE: $450k → 8%COMMUNITY OUTREACH THROUGH RADICAL EMPOWERMENT (CORE): $10k → 15%LIVE VIOLENCE FREE: $10k → 8%NEW NARRATIVE: $200k → 8%NEW NARRATIVE: $135k → 8%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%INDIGENOUS WELLNESS ALLIANCE INC: $20k → 18%PILLARS FOR THE COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $10k → 18%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $10k → 18%REDWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 18%NUESTRA ALIANZA DE WILLITS: $10k → 18%SOMALI BANTU ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 11%LICENSE TO FREEDOM: $10k → 11%RISE UP INDUSTRIES: $10k → 11%TRANSFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
NY
OR
IA
PA
CA
NC
HI
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 49%.

Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 17 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
57

Total granted

$7.3M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+34%

Still filing today

76%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $815k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ALOHA HOUSE INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +37%
  • NN
    NEW NARRATIVE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $785k · revenue +95%
  • RJ
    RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $701k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • AP
    ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +317%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthright 360

To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…

—
2
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
3
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Westside Community Mental Health Center Westside Community Services Inc

The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.

Health
5
Sun Street Centers

To prevent alcohol and drug addiction by offering education, prevention and recovery to individuals and families, regardless of income level.

Human Services
6
Community Forward Sf Inc

Community Forward SF's support services create pathways from crisis to long-term stability through our Women's Wellness Pathway, a proven continuum linking a 24/7 drop-in center, shelter, transitional housing, behavioral health care, and…

Health
7
Southern California Alcohol and Drug Programs Inc

Substance abuse prevention, treatment, education, and co-occurring disorders that follow or originate to the same

Health
8
Interim Inc

Interim, inc.'s mission is to provide services and affordable housing to supporting members of our community with mental illness in building productive and satisfying lives.

—
9
Alpha Project for the Homeless

Alpha Project for the Homeless (Alpha Project) was organized in February 1987 under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The mission of Alpha Project is to empower individuals, families, and…

—
10
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
11
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
12
Sacramento Recovery House Inc

Sacramento Recovery House, Inc., is dedicated to providing gender responsive, trauma informed, residential services to adult persons seeking recovery from substance use disorders.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Coast Opportunities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Adulting Irl. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/68
Grantees still filing
38/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALOHA HOUSE INC: $1,532,526 · OtherALOHA HOUSE INCCOMMUNITY THROUGH HOPE: $1,259,728 · OtherCOMMUNITY THROUGH HOPEMENDOCINO COAST HOSPITALITY CENTER: $378,000 · OtherMENDOCINO COAST HOSPITALITY CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · Other+69 more: $1,633,030 · Other+69 moreRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $701,452 · HealthRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATIO…Hyperbarics Health and Wellness Foundation Inc: $662,733 · HealthHyperbarics Health and We…MENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCE: $527,000 · HealthMENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCESCRIPPS HEALTH: $180,000 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTHREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC: $175,000 · HealthREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CO…+7 more: $195,000 · Health+7 moreNEW NARRATIVE: $785,050 · Human ServicesNEW NARRATIVEALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $200,000 · Human ServicesALAMEDA POINT…HOPE THE MISSION: $175,000 · Human ServicesHOPE THE MISS…+12 more: $150,000 · Human Services+12 moreHOMEBASE: $698,000 · PhilanthropyHOMEBASENATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $430,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PH…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPEER TRIBE FOUNDATION: $310,000 · Arts & CultureOUTSIDE THE FRAME: $152,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $30,000 · Arts & CultureST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $300,000 · ReligionHAMILTON FAMILIES: $126,000 · Housing & ShelterHousing 4 the Homeless: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION HOPE-NORTH COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHumble Design Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterROSE HAVEN CIC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,003,284Health$2,441,185Human Services$1,310,050Philanthropy$1,138,000Arts & Culture$492,000Religion$300,000Housing & Shelter$166,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALOHA HOUSE INC: $1,532,526 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetNEW NARRATIVE: $785,050 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $701,452 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEBASE: $698,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetHyperbarics Health and Wellness Foundation Inc: $662,733 over 3y, 92% of budgetMENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCE: $527,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $430,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENDOCINO COAST HOSPITALITY CENTER: $378,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetPEER TRIBE FOUNDATION: $310,000 over 1y, 97% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $300,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $200,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $180,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC: $175,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION: $175,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOUTSIDE THE FRAME: $152,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetHAMILTON FAMILIES: $126,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING: $100,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetAdulting Irl: $65,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetYOUTH ERA: $55,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHANDLER LODGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCABRITO FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetMCAVHN CARE AND PREVENTION NETWORK: $30,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNew PATH: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RANCH RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFamily Health International Inc: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLICENSE TO FREEDOM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHousing 4 the Homeless: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetOPERATION HOPE-NORTH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MARIPOSA INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetJUST TRANSITION ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetXA KAKO DILE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetViet Voices FKA Viet Vote: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetThe Ford Street Project: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSISTERS OF THE ROAD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEpiphany Women In Focus: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCommunity Outreach Through Radical Empowerment: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL HUMAN SERVICES DATA CONSORTIUM: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetOur Time To Act: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEQUALITY ALLIANCE OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The San Diego Foundat…Price Philanthropies …Catalyst of San Diego…The Conrad Prebys Fou…Alliance Healthcare F…The California Wellne…The California Endowm…Sempra FoundationThe Cushman FoundationDavid C Copley Founda…Leichtag Foundation
Community Foundation of Mendocino CountyCA33.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Mendocino County · The San Diego Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment · Sempra Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Leichtag Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Community Outreach Through Radical Empowerment: 70% of income from government
  • Youth Era: 39% of income from government
  • New Narrative: 6% of income from government
  • Outside the Frame: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arlene and Michael Rosen’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home